View Single Post
Old 04-30-2011, 06:10 AM   #8
Silverbullet
Nissanaholic!
 
Silverbullet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC and Norfolk VA
Age: 39
Posts: 1,650
Trader Rating: (2)
Silverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really niceSilverbullet is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Silverbullet
Those numbers just seem way too high for it to be realistic and function reliably at the same time IMO. Like in that NASA video said, material technology is the limiting factor. It is the same reason the internal combustion engine is so inefficient.


I'd like to respond to this comment also since it was directed at me even though its was months ago:
Quote:
Originally Posted by supervenom View Post

What you don't seem to understand is that the future mother-ship would work off of magnetic levitation of some sort. Perhaps even helium. Being fully automated, the weight would not be as great as that of a Nimitz Class.
The point missed here is regardless of what technology is used to fly a mothership, it still requires energy. Magnetic levitation still requires something to generate its flux field. Even if a mother ship uses a lighter weight material than steel, having to house all those other aircrafts and just being the size it is, it certainly will weigh on the same magnitude of a carrier. I stand by my statement
__________________
HouseBuyers365.com
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flybert
Go back to whatever Honda forum you came from.
Silverbullet is offline   Reply With Quote