View Single Post
Old 06-29-2005, 06:58 PM   #28
Jeff240sx
I hate you too...
 
Jeff240sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Age: 42
Posts: 5,828
Trader Rating: (0)
Jeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBS14
Jeff, the power increases are in different parts of the powerband. Not all of them increase in the same spot. So while each part may increase power by that much, they won't be all in the same part of the power curve, yielding lower numbers. However I do plan on continuing with my n/a buildup, so with those parts/modifications, we'll see if I'm at 225rwhp. If I am, I'm calling it a day. I'd be sooooo damn happy wit that.
Allright. I'm going to concede that 225 is hard to do. 200, however, should be very well attainable with current technology. That's what I'm sticking with. I know that 1-2 years ago, 175whp was hard to best.. I have a bit more trust in current products on the market.
And most of those items are top-end gainers. Exhaust, header, cams, ect. The pulley is gains across the board from underdriving, and more gains in upper rpms, ect. That's a general rule of NA tuning, is you shift the torque up top.
-Jeff
__________________
Whatup?
Jeff240sx is offline   Reply With Quote