Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum - View Single Post

*Jeff240sx* · 02-03-2002, 11:22 AM

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from dephrag on 8:39 pm on Feb. 2, 2002
The Celica puts up some impressive numbers, 180 Hp, low torque however, the sr seems to have slightly better numbers, but it is a heavier car, and is 10 years old now.. </td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>

Umm, ok.  The GTS has 25 more horsepower, and like 30 less ft/lbs of torque than a stock ka.  So the KA should win off the line.  But then you say a sr20det's numbers are a LITTLE better?  205 ft / lbs of torque, and 203 hp. That is about 20 more hp, and 60-70 more ft/lbs of torque.  Thats the top of the line gts engine vs. the bottom of the rung JDM engine.
sr20 should roast the gts... if not, theres a problem.
-Jeff

02-03-2002, 11:22 AM	#12
Jeff240sx I hate you too... Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Tampa, FL Age: 42 Posts: 5,828 Trader Rating: (0)	</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from dephrag on 8:39 pm on Feb. 2, 2002 The Celica puts up some impressive numbers, 180 Hp, low torque however, the sr seems to have slightly better numbers, but it is a heavier car, and is 10 years old now.. </td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> Umm, ok.  The GTS has 25 more horsepower, and like 30 less ft/lbs of torque than a stock ka.  So the KA should win off the line.  But then you say a sr20det's numbers are a LITTLE better?  205 ft / lbs of torque, and 203 hp. That is about 20 more hp, and 60-70 more ft/lbs of torque.  Thats the top of the line gts engine vs. the bottom of the rung JDM engine. sr20 should roast the gts... if not, theres a problem. -Jeff