|
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (Loren @ July 16 2002,5:34)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">yeah i'll say what sykik didn't, that good was an outright idiot, your just mildly stupid, and overly confident. #1 If Enzo Ferrari did it has to be right? Do you know how much technology has came out since his death? If we did everything like Enzo Ferrari then well it would be bad, because your moms Taurus has a lot more technology in it than anything he ever had a hand in building (in, his "hay day", by the time the F40 was out, he could barely cut the mustard) anyways, FWD cars do get better traction because of the weight on the front, but then theres weight transfer, blah blah blah, i skimmed most of it because it was getting unbarebly stupid, if you want me to go through it and pick out all the dumb stuff both of you said i can, but im content with this...
oh and that shit about motors aren't powered by gasoline, thats a bunch of shit. and i just happened to have a Webster New Collegiate Dictionary sitting on my desk...
motor \mot-er\ n [L, fr. motus, pp. of movere to move] 1 : one that imparts motion; specif: PRIME MOVER 2 : any of various power units that develop energy or impart motion: as a : a small compact engine b : INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE: esp : a gasoline engine..................
so yeah, where did you hear that from?</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Funny... I'm reading Webster's Complete Dictionary and Thesaurus: Fourth Edition...
motor
n. anything that produces motion; a machine for converting electrical energy into mechanical energy.
adj*.production of movement through the use of a motor or muscular movements.
engine
n. a machine by which physical power is applied to produce a physical effect; a locomotive; a machine using chemical energy in the form of heat expansion to create mechanical energy.
If you look online or read a modern automotive books they will state something similar to what was posted after what you said; that because an inernal combustion engine does produce motion it could technically fall into the class of a motor, much like a square could be called a rectangle because it has four 90 degree angles, but doesn't neccesairly mean the same thing.
Oh well I'm expecting more flames from you to roll in because I made fun of your social disorder. And you are taking the Enzo Ferrari thing quit a bit out of context... I never said EVERYTHING SHOULD BE LIKE ENZO FERRARI'S CONCEPTS AND VIEWS, I was using it as an example of how he started a chain of high performance prestigious cars which many super-car manufacturers have adapted ideas from. And one of them being the RWD has more potential than FWD.
Oh well Loren, once again you have displayed your lack of social skills and your only true ability to criticize others... You could have just left yourself out of this and no one would have thought anymore or less of you....But now I think even more of you as an angry little Eminem who needs to criticize everyone else because their dads didnt work on cars for thirty years.
__________________
*JEdubz*
|