ok tyler.. people run 9psi on stock internal'd F-Bodys all day. I was planning on running 6. Im not gonna throw a "shaft" or anything. I said I was gonna quit nitpicking, but your fairly dumb, you don't throw crankshafts, the rods get thrown. A crank will touch the bearings because of the lack of lubrication/spinning too fast/hard. Hate to break this to you guys, but I can buy a camaro, for virtually the same price as 240(same year/miles), and the camaro will have over
TWICE the horsepower of a 240. By the time you get a SR and do the bolt ons to get to that power range, you've spent around 4k (at least, i haven't done the math, so i said a liberal 4k).
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>
Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">GM sucks, man. Just buy the 240 and have the best looking car in school. If you get a Camaro, you might have the fastest, but only when it's running.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
I only car about cars that are running, the Camaro stock vs. the 240sx stock is a lot more sportier. And unless a car isn't ass ugly and is gonna get me made fun of to no end, I don't really care as long as it performs well. But looks are definetly subjective, I'd say more than 90% of people (that i associate with) would say the Camaro looks better than a S14a stock.
Oh just hit me that you might be talking about reliability, GMs are reliable cars, and today basically all cars are reliable, You don't go buy and brand new car and have it break down all the time.