View Single Post
Old 03-05-2008, 02:13 PM   #15
OptionZero
Post Whore!
 
OptionZero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Norcal
Age: 41
Posts: 6,263
Trader Rating: (2)
OptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfectionOptionZero is close to perfection
Send a message via AIM to OptionZero
This has nothing to do with freedom. Zilvia is an open forum, no paid membership required to post. There is nothing unreasonable about holding someone responsible for what they said; check yourself before you wreck your own case.

What your friend posted is admissible in court because it is a "party admission"- when the "speaker" is a party and it's being offered by the opposite side. If you are in the lawsuit, your words matter, even when produced out of court.

Now, the reading snippets to make a point (whether false or true) might seem shady, but if I recall correctly if the opposing party only read an exerpt into the record, you are entitled to read additional material into the record that is part of the same document/conversation to provide the jury and judge with context. We didn't hear if that person's lawyer did that, although it's not a foolproof countermeasure.

The lesson is, if you're in a lawsuit, shut the FUCK up until final judgement and someone is in jail OR you have cashed the check.

When I begin practicing, that is likely the #1 thing I'd tell any client I had, and I'm kinda surprised your friend's attorney never mentioned it.
OptionZero is offline   Reply With Quote