View Single Post
Old 05-22-2008, 11:22 AM   #11
water
Zilvia Junkie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: FL
Age: 45
Posts: 373
Trader Rating: (0)
water has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud ofwater has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by racepar1 View Post
I am willing to bet that you spent enough on your SR to easily build a 200hp or so KA. Easy is a relative term. There is nothing easier than slapping a bigger turbo on to make more power (except nitrous), there is more involved than JUST the turbo but not much. If YOU think that you can do better then good for you, our definitions of better are different. To you better means more power. To me better means a very responsive engine built N/A, and be at least somewhat original. I don't care if it is easier with other engines, easier isn't my point nor is total HP. I don't need a bajillion horsepower to do what I want, I DO need a more responsive moderately powerful engine. Horsepower doesn't make faster lap times, the driver and the suspension do that.
Are you mental? If all I cared about was peak hp, my setup would not have been what it was, nor would I have been pointing attention to my powerband, and I would have just posted up the 20+psi graphs (which were just for fun). I could have gotten a GT30r just as easily and sacrificed some spool and response for peak hp. Or a larger turbine a/r. Anyone into road racing should be able to appreciate the powerband I had - which is exactly what I had intended when I designed that setup. Notice how after reaching peak tq it doesn't drop at all before redlining (with any bit of significance)? My car was a rock solid track car, very responsive, and a BLAST to drive.
water is offline   Reply With Quote