View Single Post
Old 11-06-2008, 10:44 AM   #12
ChiSleepyEyes
Zilvia Member
 
ChiSleepyEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago
Age: 37
Posts: 275
Trader Rating: (0)
ChiSleepyEyes is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to ChiSleepyEyes
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoSideways View Post

The evidence is there to support the fact that the jet fuel weakened the structure enough to where the building itself could no longer support the weight of the tower above the impact point, thus the buildings fell.

It's not rocket science, there's no conspiracy on that, it's just physics.
physics my a$$ after that long re-routed flight back to NY there wouldnt be enough fuel to heat metal till it was molten...look at the numerous instances where buildings..high rise buildings... have been struck my planes and burned completely from top to bottom and are still standing today... so your telling me the little remnants of jet fuel that were left took down that building. and the explosions that were heard from inside the building were not echo...they were spaced explosions, planted within the towers. they did not happen all at once, they were planned and spaced throughout the burning of the building to create the illusion that shit was going wrong...you people honestly have no idea
ChiSleepyEyes is offline