View Single Post
Old 11-09-2008, 12:41 AM   #20
luftrofl
Zilvia Junkie
 
luftrofl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area (510)
Posts: 334
Trader Rating: (0)
luftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant futureluftrofl has a brilliant future
Simply put, perpetual motion, is impossible.

Machines cannot be 100% efficient. This is because friction causes energy to be converted into heat and effectively lost from the system. To make this explicit: this loss of energy, no matter how small, will ultimately drain all of the energy from the system and cause it to stop unless extra energy is added.

Keep in mind that I'm not knocking the idea of a car that runs on compressed air. Personally, I think that it seems like a good, cheap, low-tech way to get around.

The thought that you could somehow make this into a perpetual motion machine, however, is naive and stupid.

Sorry for not explaining this in detail previously. I should've known that someone arguing that a perpetual motion machine knew nothing about physics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B Love View Post
Ok Mr. Automotive physics major explain to me the downfalls of this system?
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Love View Post
Really because Im pretty sure it shows a car and a motor working in the video. A small compressor being powered by the battery can constantly refill the air tanks. So explain to me what would stop this idea from working?
Quote:
Originally Posted by B Love View Post
You feel pretty good huh, Love how people cannot explain there statements. oh physics its physics. Because Im pretty sure the people who built that thing couldnt be as smart as you right?
__________________
Engrish is funny in Japan. In America, it's for stupid fanboys.
luftrofl is offline   Reply With Quote