Quote:
Originally Posted by SR240DET
Ok, I see what is going on here. You are confusing theory with scientific theory. What you ended up doing was use the general term for theory, which is basically speculation, in place of a scientific theory, which is the careful examination of existing facts to explain things. The scientific theory of evolution has provided a reasonable analysis of facts that explain how organisms evolve overtime. With all the information gathered today, it’s impossible to ignore the scientific theory of evolution as anything other than fact, but only the ignorant will see otherwise.
I would like to know what exactly you think constitutes as insufficient evidence for evolution. I can see how pseudoscience such as creation science will think there is insufficient evidence. If you cant explain in your own words then you truly don't have an understanding of the subject, therefore, your reasoning is biased and your showing true ignorance.
|
.....really?.....i guess evolution is complete right?.....
the ignorant sure as hell aint me
ok so there are 2 types of evolution- macroevolution and microevolution..ok..microevolution (variation) is real part, we can clearly see it every day, the color of birds, size of legs, etc...this is something even creationist can agree with because we see it in everyday life, but there are strict limitations that are never crossed...whenever the limitations are pushed beyond there limits by selective breeding (plants and animals) the line dies out or is sterile,one characteristic may increase, but others will diminish(example:donkey+horse=mule, cannot mate)..according to evolution changes continue, merging new creatures gradually together or apart..
so do big changes really happen?(macroevolution)..it took tens of thousands of years for our becoming correct? yet we do not see this problem in bacteria, who form new generations within 12 minutes..there are more bacteria on your body than there are on all the beaches in the world, it lives in just about any environment..i understand that bacteria is a single celled organism and all but what keeps us from costantly evolving? bacteria does it (Pulmonary tuberculosis)..according to evolution change is constant..
-what is the common ancestor between apes and humans?
we dont know..but supposedly its there...oh yea we need evidence right?
-what happened to Cro-Magnun?
supposedly they died off in the homo sapien subfamily..but wait, how did we interbreed? ex:horse and donkey
-what happened to Homo floresiensis?
we dont know..
-Ardipethicus Ramadus is suppose to be an ancestor, yet it looks nothing like the previous hominans
-Homo erectus had femurs that were the size of Shaqs, a 12yr old was averaging 6'1..yet we're getting shorter, why? availability to protien is better today than back then
-why are our heads getting bigger and our pelvises stay the same? according to evolution the mothers should have died at birth not allowing it to pass on its genes..
- we are the only hominan with a chin, yet it serves no purpose...
so basically overnight, literally, these changes occured..and i dont buy it,but like i said i dont lean entirely on the religious side eitherr because they too have their gaps...no matter what somehow we came from absolute nothingness
you cant make something out of nothing because nothing, really is just nothing, but even with nothing, there is always something-quote my philosophy professor Clayton Kradjon