Quote:
Originally Posted by irax
You implied they were injured by your choice in quotes. a roll cage that fails to do its "duty" implies that people were critically injured or dead. And yes there is a guarantee that there is an increase in survival rate, if there wasn't then why do all the automotive racing sanctions require one? It's just plain stupid to roll around in a street car with a roll cage without padding, he'll it's just as retarded to race in a car with a roll cage but no padding. Yes drivers still die every year on the race track even with the best safety gear, but is exponentially better than back before the 60's, before roll bars were mandatory not even roll cages.
So before you get off that high horse, you might want to watch your step and make sure your retard helmet is strapped on tightly.
You don't like my guarantee's ? go drive around without a seat belt on for the rest of your life.
anyone want to post that infamous pic of the s14 that rolled over at HTM with the "crashco" bolt in roll cage?
|
Well sorry for using that quote, I just meant to bring out the point that they can fail. Now that I think about it, I wouldn't say cage itself failed, but instead the mounting points were too thin..
It seems like you aren't reading what I said carefully. I know they help with safety in race situations, but I'm talking about the street. But at least we both agree that shouldn't be used in street cars.. I also said this was a "full front flip" or "end over end" type of crash .. Not a barrel roll type.. If you want to believe the forces on the cage and chassis are the same in both types of roll overs then.. okay..
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBEEWON
Not even trying to be a jerk, but what credibility do you have to back up your position?
|
I have 0
