View Single Post
Old 08-21-2013, 07:31 AM   #4029
Future240
Future Moderator
 
Future240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Places
Age: 37
Posts: 12,908
Trader Rating: (17)
Future240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfectionFuture240 is close to perfection
Send a message via AIM to Future240 Send a message via MSN to Future240 Send a message via Yahoo to Future240
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingkilburn View Post
This discussion took a left turn to stupid.
Quite. Lets bring it back

Quote:
Originally Posted by K_style View Post
which I can see the possibilities.

2.0 turbo for GT86
2.5 N/A for FRS

WTF really???
Silvia
240Sx

I would have never thought that a company would consider doing that again. I would not understand it a bit. The entire internet has been aflame with people calling for a turbo. I get ditching the boxer for a I4. It would probably cost less and make the car more Toyota's.

I can see it now, 15 years from now people arguing on toyobaru (zilvia for frs/brz also owned by West) about importing the turbo vs building and turboing the N/A.....sigh..

All we want is relatively light weight, rwd, attractive, turbo car. 250-280hp stock with a stout engine that can support 400+ without serious engine mods. Tight steering, good handling with room for improvement via the after market.

Is that so much to ask? Looking at you Nissan and Toyota.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatGuy
Your opinions mean nothing to me, and you can both go fuck yourselves..
Future240 is offline   Reply With Quote