View Single Post
Old 01-16-2015, 07:31 PM   #940
slider2828
Post Whore!
 
slider2828's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 6,040
Trader Rating: (13)
slider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfectionslider2828 is close to perfection
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX View Post
It's all personal opinion as there is no absolute BEST..........What my personal requirements are and my personal preference is is probably light years from what yours is for instance.

I am running a FX400 sprung 6 puck. Holds 450-490WHP and 400+ lb ft at the wheels.

Barely above stock pressure and engagement point is not harsh at all. I can DD this clutch all day if I like.

Not sure what you are looking for angel mkiv, but that is my perosnal opinion on the FX400/FX500 series of clutches from Clutchmasters
Depends also what clutches you have driven? Also depends on budget as well. I have driven on the exedy stage 2 vs. OG Giken vs. Exedy Hyper Single vs. RPS.

Exedy stage 2 didn't last 6 months on the track, granted it was the shaved down version but whatever. OS Giken and Exedy's feel a bit stiffer and RPS was very close to those. Big thing is these are full face sprung disks, which are going to engagement a lot smoother and earlier than any 6 puck disk....

I am just saying that 6 pucks are harsh and even the exedy stage 2 which is a hybrid 6 puck/full face was a bit hard engagement.

That is what lead to my conclusion in terms of value. Also why is there no clamping force for the CM FX400? This should be the basis on deciding for most clutches besides pedal feel and cost?
__________________
Turn and Burn!
slider2828 is offline   Reply With Quote