View Single Post
Old 11-08-2016, 08:14 AM   #50
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 4,829
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
Quote:
Originally Posted by soundboy View Post
Haltech gets my vote, but speak to a tuner. Unless you tuning yourself. Doesnt make sense going with something that the tuner cant tune.

SAFC and powerfc has their place in the ecu/piggyback world but once you start getting into it , these quickly arnt enough.
start naming all the features of the power FC for me. Then do the same and list all the features of, say, AEM or Haltech.

now, circle the critical features, such as datalogging, VE map tuning, closed loop operation, etc...

Whats that? Both ECU have the same identical critical feature lists? So you are telling me that the power-FC is true, full stand-alone ECU, with all required capability of the more expensive AEM for high power cars?

Lets get nitty gritty. How many AEM/Haltech/PFC/MS/etc... have you (and whoever else wants to play) tuned, as of right now, that they can substantiate and validate the claim that the "Power FC wasn't enough"? When has anybody ever had a power FC that "wasn't good enough"? I've never had that happen and I am on PFC car #100+ lost count
__________________
5.3/4l80e/turbo 240sx playthrough:
tinyurl.com/4l80er
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote