Ok Exitspeed.
Since you refuse to read my dissertation I will ask a couple quick questions below (or I recommend you actually read your own posted articles). Also, do not cast stones as you as well are playing the hypocrite as you labeled me as a "liberal" without knowing me, but I digress......
All I said was "you are a law abiding gun owner correct??" which escalates my prior sentence statement........But again, I digress and will move on from the "assumptions" argument.
Questions: You said in your earlier posts that unless it begins to affect you, you are maintaining status quo, correct?? So with that said, the ban on guns NOT IN YOUR STATE or which does not affect you (since well, you know, you do not own a gun) shouldn't be of your concern correct?? So which is it then??
You don't own a gun, but oh shit, the liberals are taking away our guns (which I wont even mention the fact that NONE of your articles posted necessarily supports your stance, but anyways.........)! Liberals are the reason we cant have nice things......but you don't own a gun, so why do you care in which case some of these ordinances were already in place, so why do you care?? How can a liberal take away something.....that was already "taken away"?? How does that make even remote sense??
I still just do not get your argument at times You keep talking out of both sides of your mouth.......
And I am glad to waste my day learning about actual stories and forming proper informative arguments. Iam no gun owner, and in all honesty, I do not have a stance one way or another. I just simply do not have enough information (outside of school shootings) to form a proper stance in my eyes.
However, I am glad reading and critical thinking is considered a waste of your time. I am perfectly OK with that.
|