Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
The nuances of the argument, which is key, is what Corbic typically fails at recognizing.
|
Lie
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
For instance; yes, the detention centers were built doing Obama's term. However, the nuance of the argument is, it was NOT built based off the policy of the Obama administration ACTIVELY pursuing, participating and drafting up policy to FORCE family separation. The centers were built for children who crossed into the US, as unaccompanied minors and acted as as a (required by law) 72 hour holding until the child is transferred to HHS and until the parents/guardians of the minors could be located.
That nuanced portion is a KEY separation of the Obama era detention centers and the ACTIVE policy of the current admin.
|
Should be easy to provide Links then.
You do realize we don't house childern with adults in prison. You do realize 30% of these childern are not related to the adults they arrive with. You do realize these people are free to go home at any time. You do realize AOC and o the DNC members willingly blocked funding to improve conditions.
You do realize pretty much all the problems we have now existed prior to Trump. It's a lot like Bush. People shit them selves over Gitmo, Watetboarding and the Patriot Act. Obama second in, never heard about Gitmo again, striaght up killing American Citizens with drones in countries were not currently at war with and a 400% increase in the Patriot Act usage. Not a peep.
Not even going to bother to source since you won't read them or return the courtesy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
Blah blah, rhetoric, personnel attacks and avoiding any actual discussion
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
Also, which is another nuanced argument which fails to get mentioned; The CONSTITUTION makes is lawful for ANY immigrant who is seeking asylum to not be classified as an illegal immigrant. Often times, they are just lumped in with the folks who come here without such a designation. This is key, and what most fail to recognize. The CONSTITUTION allows it, however, people only reference the Constitution and their own interpretation when it fits a their own narrow specific narrative (see the most inane interpretation of 2nd Amendment)
I digress...
|
Soooo which amendment is it then that says you can bypass all immigration laws regarding refugee status and asylum application?
But I digress. You'll just spew more personnel attacks and avoid any rational, fact based discussion. An inconvenient truth.