Also are you saying Vindman, as long term veteran, is not a viable witness??
I am struggling to see how you came to this conclusion considering the very bi-partisan nature of the folks who did testify and included tangible evidence.
Quote:
|
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine specialist on the National Security Council. Vindman listened to the July 25 telephone conversation in the White House Situation Room and reported his concerns about the president's mention of political investigations to the top NSC attorney, John Eisenberg. He said the attorney decided to move the record of the call onto a highly classified system that few could access.
|
Vidnman is valuable testimony I am not sure there is anyone as bi-partisan as Vidnmand with so many years of service who I would go against. And this is just one example