Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
I stopped listening or caring when king constantly made all these assumptions (engine must be old, wrong dyno, etc. regardless of what the actual poster of the results state) to FORCE his narrative
Lol. Why do you guys keep resounding? All 2 liter engines produce the same VE is a whole bunch of bullshit when we are talking turbos and the heads ability to "efficiently" fill cylinders (read k series, VE or B series heads)
King has never dealt with a head or turbo that is able to fill engines way above 100% VE......lol.
Yeah next....
|
My problem with it, is he is spreading misinformation about what a specific motor with a specific head can produce and he’s wrong.
All his math formulas and knowledge yet he still isn’t open to expand his mind and think outside of them. That perhaps, something has changed and has allowed the increase of torque vs dismissing it and calling it bullshit. .
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
It funny, jr I had a written up a post and mentioned the LSR car. The browser stopped responding and I didn't bother to waste my time
King, that is NOT flywheel HP.
https://5523motorsports.com/road-wor...s-unstoppable/
Here is a pic of Nick and JWT on the (chassis) dyno......... |
I find it extremely amusing that he dismisses Def and calls his claims bullshit, when we all know who Def is.
He also talks about researching but goes on to regurgitate his rhetorical nonsense instead of researching himself...
Anyway, King these are legitimate power levels and real world data. As I said before, take it or leave it. At this point, I realize you cannot think outside of the box. It’s always going to be black and white for you.