View Single Post
Old 06-14-2020, 01:24 PM   #5
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 42
Posts: 4,829
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX View Post
Alot of the "good" info is based off of "invalid" assumptions outside of dyno graphs.....

I just read the first page. Another ridiculous and unfounded assumption....

The VE has the exact same VE (cylinder fill) as a standard DE head at 4000 rpm hahahahahhah! Have you even seen the flow numbers on a DE vs VE king? That is a grossly inaccurate assumptions and based off blind ignorance....

Goodluck to you king....you're gonna need it

I guess nobody here understands what Volumetric efficiency is.

Flow rate has absolutely nothing to do with Volumetric Efficiency.
I don't know why you keep quoting flow rate like it has anything to do with torque lol.

I am not the idiot here. You just have no idea what VE means, or how an engine works.

I have proven beyond reasonable doubt that both DE and VE engines/heads have identical VE with my previous post (https://zilvia.net/f/showpost.php?p=...0&postcount=56) showing dyno graphs from both VE and DE engines which produce the same exact torque which = same exact VE.

Sorry but you need to learn more about engines before making these ridiculous posts.

Last edited by Kingtal0n; 06-14-2020 at 01:55 PM..
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote