Quote:
Originally Posted by midnight zenki
Here you go Corbic, I?ll give in and spoon feed you my original statement above. It was only two pages back, it doesn?t say that I said the people burning the court house are non-violent so please suck it easy.
|
You are dancing and playing games.
MZ : Feds are arresting innocent peaceful protestors, fuck ya'll for not standing up!
Corbic : No, they are arresting violent pieces of shit, see video.
MZ : Reeeeee, it's all peace and love!
Corbic: watch video, is that non-violent? Yes or No
MZ: Reeeee! I already gave you my statement!
So again.
Do you support violent arsonists who are trying to blind federal officers and burn down the court house?
Or
Do you support the Feds trying to arrest instigators in the most peaceful and discrete way possible?
It's one or the other, there is no middle ground.
But you'll start Reeeee'ing about something unrelated and have everyone chase you down that path to prove you wrong. Just like this idiotic exercise of arguing whether or not said author is biased.
I wish I could give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are just a troll. However, I suspect you are an NPC. Even if you are not, as the old saying goes "sometimes pending to be an asshole and being an asshole are the same thing".
.