[!Zar!]

Originally Posted by Corbic

1. The media and individuals like to pick and choose how some is identified based on appearance and not actual lineage.

Great example, despite being half German, Half Peruvian, Zimmerman was identified as a "Whiteman", but Kappernack is a "Blackman" despite being half white and half black.

You're mixing up nationality vs ethnicity.

Originally Posted by Corbic

Another example is Kamala Harris who is now identifying as a Blackwomen even though in the past she identified as an Indian women. Her Jamaican father, Donald Harris does not identify as black, but as Jamaican and visually appears South American and not African.

Jamaicans are black.

Originally Posted by Corbic

2. Actual life experience. This is why I (and others) claim the left is the real racists. They see someone with pigmented skin and immediately assume they are a victim and think like all the other similar toned pigmented people.

There isn't an automatic assumption. Many of those who have been in similar situations have a sense of understanding when they see happenings of police butality.

Originally Posted by Corbic

Kolin Kappernack, great example. The dude is "half black" but could easily pass for any number of races if he desired. Polynesian, Mexican, Latin, Italian, Persian, Egyptian, Indian, Jamaican, etc.

And what's your point?

Originally Posted by Corbic

His skin tone, his "blackness", has never once been a detriment or a disadvantage. It's actually an advantage and a corner stone of his recent relevance and success.

That's a bold claim of which is pure speculation.

Originally Posted by Corbic

Barrak Obama, would ya'll be sucking his dick if he was a shade lighter and identified as a "Wealthy White Harvard Graduate"? Again, his race never once held him back, it catapulted him to success.

You mean like how everyone sucks the dick of Sanders and Biden, because they're black too... oh wait.

Originally Posted by Corbic

What holds various racial communities back isn't their skin tone, hair type or any of that. It's their culture, values and up brining.

Yet again, pure speculation on your part. Oprah, one of the richest women alive can be considered privileged and has experienced racism herself.

Originally Posted by Corbic

If you're raised in an improvised home with a single parent that doesn't care, go to garbage public schools, drop out and become an ignorant dunce... You act a clown and ruin your own life.

This is a huge generalization and full of ignorance. And back to my previous points made earlier, nothing of which you're saying is legal justification of a cop performing poorly on the job and killing someone.

Originally Posted by Corbic

So yeah, you choose to be a "stereotype" and a victim.

There are many stories of individuals who have had issues with police when doing nothing wrong. Here is another one for you.

Originally Posted by Corbic

Don't want to have people threat you like a thug? Lose the gold chains, pull up your paints and trade in the raiders Hoodie for a pink polo and khakis.

What is treating someone like a thug?

Originally Posted by Corbic

Don't want cops to shoot you seven times?

Yes.

Originally Posted by Corbic

Try not raping and beating your baby mama

So you're saying all black people beat their baby mamas?

Originally Posted by Corbic

Refusing to comply after being tazed twice and then going into a vehicle that you don't own while they shout "stop or we'll shoot" with guns drawn.

1. Tazers can be hit or miss in terms of working depending on clothing and aim by the officer.

2. If someone was doing nothing against the law and treated like a criminal, they have every right to be agitated when treated like one.

3. Why are their guns drawn in the first place?
3.1 Stop or we'll shoot should be if the officers livers are in danger. Yes, perceived danger is subjective. But many of the happenings are when there is situations of no imminent danger at hand.





You make a lot of generalizations made of pure speculation. It's disappointing, but not surprising.