It pains me to say that Corbic brings up a valid point that no one wants to see, but he does. I honestly never heard the term 'what-aboutisms' until it was typed in this thread, but when you're comparing things isn't that how you go about it? He isn't comparing something recent (Capitol) to something that happened forever ago...
If it's terrorism for one act and not the other, well, you know. It's just like Twitter.
Where a lot of people see defense of some fuckwit they turn a blind eye to the even application of the rules. The blanket of righteousness is warm but is also blinding.
__________________
The mark of a true sucka: 'RARE JDM' & 'OLD LOGO NISMO'
|