[Future240]

Interesting this one is.

Should the dems have given the repubs more time with this problem official or were the dems right in their actions is the question of the hour.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...ouse-votes-to-

If the resolution sets a new precedent for removing members, McGovern added that’s okay with him.

“If the precedent’s going to be that if somebody advocates for putting a bullet in the head of a member ... if that is going to be the new determination as to what it takes to throw people off of committees, I’m fine with that,” he said. “If this is not the bottom, I don’t know what the hell is.”

Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole, the panel’s top Republican, called Greene’s promotion of various crackpot conspiracy theories “deeply offensive,” “vile” and “repugnant,” but argued against the resolution on process grounds.

“This hearing is premature,” Cole said, reasoning that the matter should first have been adjudicated by the House Ethics Committee to avoid setting a new precedent for reprimanding members.

In case yall are not sure what the fuss is about

Before being elected in November, it has been discovered that Greene used her Facebook and Twitter accounts to call for the executions of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), former President Barack Obama and other prominent Democrats she claimed were part of the “deep state.”

The first-term congresswoman also harassed survivors of a 2018 school shooting in Florida and falsely claimed they faked the massacre as part of a Democratic plot to implement stricter gun laws. Adding to the deranged web, Greene has pushed baseless claims about 9/11 being an “inside job” and peddled anti-Semitic theories about wealthy Jews using “space lasers” to set forest fires in California.