Thread: Turbo Vs. S/C
View Single Post
Old 03-12-2002, 07:16 AM   #19
thewholefnshow
Zilvia Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 672
Trader Rating: (0)
thewholefnshow is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via ICQ to thewholefnshow
Is everyone forgetting cost and practicality? And retard (almost) can bolt up a supercharger to their car without worries of the torture your engine will soon undergo, turbos are so much harder to install and require a lot more work to be done right. Superchargers are as close to plug and play power as you can get. I want a turbo, but if someone makes a supercharger that lays down 250 horses, I am first in line, cause that is enough power for me, and I know I won't have to spend 1000 bucks getting it installed, I will just need a weekend and a well llit garage. And superchargers are getting better all the time, like the centrifugal style which is basically a turbo that runs of the pully rather than exhuast gases...

But I would love that turbo hks made... the supercharger turbocharger combo that is in the Meguires Integra and in lots of MR2's... 4 psi super 16 psi turbo = 465 hp at the wheels.... that is impressive out of a 1.8... imagine that on a 2.4
thewholefnshow is offline   Reply With Quote