Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lilredstiffy
You guys are majorly retarded for consistently getting upset about people with a car 1 inch lower than 'ideal', a wheel one inch wider than 'ideal' for the tire, and above all arguing about nonsense in a thread challenging who sacrificies the most daily driveability for the sake of looking badass.
Also -3 camber is fucking perfect for front camber. not too much at all...which shows ka24de123 you are knocking something you've never even tried...wtg socal wussbag.
|
-3 is not perfect, and I don't see any reason why my opinions on chassis setup make me a wussbag. Again with the assumptions... do you know me? No, so shut up and sit down. We're both expressing opinions because unless you have the pyrometer readings to prove that -3 is any better what you say is just that: an opinion.
How the hell would you know whether or not I've run -3 degrees camber? I've run -2.8 before but the car was less-well-prepped. I'm fairly sure I could get away with -2.5 or slightly less now but I think -3 is pretty excessive and concedes too much in braking. What was -3 degrees static increases further under compression and, depending on caster, steering angle.
I previously made concessions to the arguments of the lowness crowd. I understand the reasons why you guys do it.
I feel like I'm cluttering up this thread by responding to all these personal attacks. (Yes, I realize I attacked chmercer, by the way) You want to continue to harass me? Take it up in PM, because I'm through.
