View Single Post
Old 01-05-2006, 11:56 PM   #18
Jeff240sx
I hate you too...
 
Jeff240sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Age: 42
Posts: 5,828
Trader Rating: (0)
Jeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond reputeJeff240sx has a reputation beyond repute
Look guy. Hypothetically I give you the best-case scenario. 200whp (extremely hard to get and rough on the street) and you get the stock 30mpg.
Now.. my car - no hypothetical involved here - makes 320whp, and gets 24mpg.

Your imaginary car: 6.67 hp per gallon. Or .15 gallons per hp.
My current car: 13.3hp per gallon. Or .075 gallons per hp.

Which is more efficient? Sure - you get better mileage overall. But that's not the debate here. Per your words - the debate is efficiency, which the real turbo car beats the imaginary car forcefully.

Now - what happened here is that you came to this post with convoluted thoughts and misinformation. And I came here with empyrical evidence. And you got owned.
-Jeff
__________________
Whatup?
Jeff240sx is offline   Reply With Quote