View Single Post
Old 03-12-2002, 10:50 PM   #17
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (AceInHole @ Mar. 11 2002,11:37)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">are you sad that you can't be a deleted member anymore???

anyways, I think it's pretty clear that the SR, being a weaker engine, isn't capable of the power the KA is, and so it's not a good choice for someone seeking more power for their car.

lol. just had to say that. great, now flames will come.... this will never die...</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Yes...

For those SR folks, don't get the wrong idea... The engine is a great engine. Lots have been accomplished, but it isn't that much better... especially considering the cheesy rocker arms... What a joke... And all the support and R&D with the SR can't seem to really trump the efforts of grass root R&D of the KA+T... So what Duy's a doctor or what not... He's not a performance part corporation... The time to use Jun's car for a comparison is if a company the size of Jun uses the same amount of resource in to a KA... than you can use the Jun car... For $10k that went into Duy's former car, that's pretty good. I haven't seen an equivalent level of performance from a grass root level SR...

CA folks, STFU... Your engine's era is way over... belongs in a junkyard or a museum.