![]() |
|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Leaky Injector
![]() |
help me...240sx or GSX?
Hi,
i got my turbo integra stolen recently, so i'm looking into a new car. Basically, i have come down between two cars...240sx (with sr20det swap, suspension and what not) or an eclipse GSX. Now i understand there might be some bias this being a 240 forum, but try not to be if u can. I honestly think a 240sx will outhandle a gsx, but how much worse in handling is a gsx? 240sx = good handling, good potential as an overall car, pretty ugly though and the interior isn't too hot. GSX = ?? handlin??, very very good power potential, comfortable, and i think it looks decent. I plan to hit up the road course often like i did before, and i'm lookin for the superior track car. let's see ur opinions. also, assume that for suspension they would have similar setups (can't compare apples to oranges)...either nimble light rwd...or awd turbo monster..haha |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#2 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
it's hard to answer your question because you didn't tell what the year of the cars you're comparing. I will assume 95-98 240, and 96-99 eclipse. if you go for the 240 you gonna be spending more money to make very fast. About handling, I drove a gst, it handle pretty goood but not as fun as my 240.
And to say this about a 240 is just wrong "pretty ugly though and the interior isn't too hot" ![]()
__________________
http://community.webshots.com/user/logo20 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Zilvia Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 41
Posts: 255
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Well, a GSX is real nice, but it is so rare to find a decent one for sale. It seems to me that nissan makes a lot better products than mitsubishi, but thats an opinion. As far as handling, the 240 had a 50/50 weight distribution ratio, can't get any better than that, but I'm not sure how the AWD setup on the GSX compares to it. Assuming you want a 97-98, you could probably get the car and the swap for the same price as a stock GSX of the same year or a little newer. At that point they would probably perform the same in the 1/4, in the 14's I believe. I know I'm showing my bias when I say I think a 97-98 240 looks better all around and has more presence than a GSX, but I had to throw it in there. As far as suspension goes, I heard the eclipses are a bitch to get a good suspension setup on there, and they cost tons of money. Another thing, if you got a GSX, you could never peel out, never drift, or anything like that. 240s can do that all day long. Just something to think about, hope I helped some.
__________________
-1997 240SX SE 5spd- ![]() -2002 Nissan OEM Gloss White Paint (June 2003) -OEM Nissan Front Lip -Type C Short Shifter -ApexI N1 Single Catback Exhaust -Test Pipe -Spec K Rear Wing -Kumho Supra Ecsta 712 ZR rated tires (205/55/16) -Eibach Pro Kit Springs -KYB AGX Struts -Llumar Centaur Premium Tint (28% front/20% back) -Alarm w/Keyless Entry -SOLD- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Leaky Injector
![]() |
good replies guys lets get some more hehe...
well yea...for a 240 i was lookin at a 95 because it'd cost like 5-6 G's...then swap the motor, fuel management, FMIC and all that junk and turn up the boost, then i'd have to toss on some like JICs hehe and azenis. That would end up costing well a good i'd say 13 thousand? w/o exact calculations...oh about the interior, i guess it's just cuz it's an older car, i dunno hehe. i like the look of the 97-98 s14s, but just not worth the money when i could toss on an s15 front. a gsx...i'd want a 97+ (bodystyle)...and yea i just question the car's handling ability, cuz dsm's are so cheap to make fast and awd power. yea i want to learn drift but certainly not a priority, i just want a good handling car...and i've heard so much junk about DSMs and their crappy handling, but at the same time i've also heard gsxs w their awd handle well. good point about the 50/50 weight distrib ratio...and the 240 is a lot lighter, i'm just wondering how much more nimble it is than the gsx...considering that the gsx, for the money, will out run the 240 on the straights. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Florida, Americas Wang!
Age: 43
Posts: 2,912
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
one thing you should know is that Mitsubishi's have weak transmisions. I had two Mitsubishi's and both times I had to change the transmisions
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() |
On the subject of handling, the GSX isn't all that great, I've seen a few in action at both of the autox's I went to last fall and I was hardly impressed, sure they were fast on the straights, but they did horrible in slaloms and hairpins, too much understeer. They were getting spanked by NA RX-7's and several other V6 american RWDs. I was at the same corner working with the guy that owned a GSX. He was in STX and said his car would run high 12's at the track, but his car wasn't that great for autox, he had eibach suspension too. So I'd say the 240SX outhandles the GSX. And if you think the 240SX is ugly, then why do you want one? I got mine because I thought it was one of the hottest cars I have ever seen. And if you do get the SR motor, the GSX will NOT outrun the 240SX on the straights.
EONE's right too, I believe the Trannies are actually made by Hyundai, at least the 3000GT tran is.. Last edited by thelinja; 12-26-2002 at 01:07 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Leaky Injector
![]() |
well i want the 240 mostly cuz of 50/50 weight distribution, RWD...good potential...and when i'm inside the car i don't see the outside anywayz
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
DSM cars are horrible for reliability. Be prepared to spend all your money repairing it.
Besides, I'm not sure where people are managing to find ways to increase the car's power without a tank of nitrous. I was under the hood of a GST the other day... the turbo is the size of my fist and there is hardly any room in any part of that packed engine bay for a bigger turbo. Also note that according to edmunds a GSX is actally .2 seconds slower than a GST on the 0-60: GST 0-60 6.5 GSX 0-60 6.7 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Leaky Injector
![]() |
well we'll ahve to see how much insurance will give me for my teg =\ then i can see exactly how far i can go
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodbridge,VA
Age: 42
Posts: 1,028
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
The 240SX is a real sweet lookingcar I love the 97-98 overall but its only due to the front end though.I also own one so that helped a lil to.But te 240SX is not 50/50 wish it were but very close iirc it is 48/52 the RX-7 and Miata are 50/50 but the neer GSX has crank walk issues which is a pain cus you wil constanly be repairing the car.The 240SX is a great car and to get you to a power level you only are looking at about 10g dependin on what year you get.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
OMNOMNOMNOM
![]() Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 44
Posts: 6,456
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
thelinja: I disagree with you, the GSX in the picture I posted had a set of GAB Coilovers ($1400) and the thing handled like mad, just as good as my 240 with HKS Coils and Sway, struts, etc. maybe even better. But my 240 needed softer springs and better tires so its hard to judge.
As for the GST being faster... maybe it is by a whole .2 sec when stock, but add 50HP and see how much slower your are when alls that happens is your front wheels burn out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() |
Well any car will out handle another with enough money and tweaking. I was just saying that the guy I was talking to was rather disappointed by his GSX and the eibach suspension setup he was running. If he had the coilovers you're talking about, the GAB's, he may have done better. I don't know much about different suspensions, so I'll leave this topic alone for now.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
i have an sr powered s13, and my bro has a big 16g powered 1st gen gsx, i know you are looking at the newer models of both cars but i think my experience might still apply.
i love both cars, but im glad to own the 240, mostly because i like being able to oversteer my brains out. the only advantage he has is drag racing cause of the all wheel drive he can jump in front of me by a car length and stay there (when he gets a good launch), but im installing my lsd soon so well see then. they are both great imo, it just depends on your taste. ![]()
__________________
![]() Last edited by xhdriver; 12-26-2002 at 10:33 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Philly
Age: 42
Posts: 9,185
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
![]() It's all depends on your personal preference, how much money you have, how much money your willing to spend and whether or not you can find one.
Your going to spend alot to make either car go fast, but the GSX will be cheaper....as for reliablity......I would stick with the Nissan. I have a friend with a turbocharged (up the a$$) GSX and he drove a SR powered S14. All I can say is he actually liked the S14 better than his.....and for some reason he know work at a Nissan dealership. ![]() Anywho...both good cars....but I have to go for ANY S14 (95-98 240SX)....mainly because I have one, I like the styling.....and you don't see too many on the streets. Also I want to have a fast AND sexy Japanese coupe.
__________________
Goals are dreams with a deadline. L.H.O.O.Q. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Turn 8 'bout to get rolled by a SC'd ITR
Age: 46
Posts: 1,849
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
weak tranny?
To comment on the weak tranny issue:
From the factory the DSM's have very weak clutchs. That way if you decide to do a 5k drop the clutch will go and not the differential. Now if you put a 6 puck unsprung clutch in it. The clutch will hold but the differential will go eventually or the tranny. So stay with the stock setup and keep replacing the clutch and not the tranny. WRXs have the same problem, upgrade the power output and clutch then the center diff or tranny will go. FYI just watch any rally coverage and you can see how disposable center diffs and trannys can be. That my friend is the "nature of the AWD beast"
__________________
'91 hatch w/ SR Sold; '03 Evo Sold 401 HP; '03 MS Protege sold; '00 Evo 6.5 TME Sold 300HP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Magnanimous Justice Distribution Service
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: BFE
Age: 23
Posts: 14,372
Trader Rating: (9)
![]() Feedback Score: 9 reviews
|
Go with a GSX.
Quote:
Does this mean Nissan will be having tranny issues now? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: May 2002
Location: Springfield, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,517
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
I don't think either Hyundai or Nissan made that transmission...
Hyundai drivetrain engineering is pretty damn good these days, though. Their 2.0 "Beta" engine used in the base Tiburon and the Elantra holds a lot of promise as a performance engine. In Hyundai's Accent WRC it seems to work pretty well... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() |
I spank monkeys for fun......naked
GSX = fwd with a little rwd assist.
When looking at tranfer case hear attached to the flywheel you can clearly see that's its impossible for a GSX to have a 50/50 torque ratio. From looking at the gears I'd say more like 80/20 if even that. the 4G63 is very similar to an SR. Almost a square motor, DIS, beefy. It has just as much if not more potential than an SR. I've seen a 1st gen run into the 12's on a stock block/head 4G with (believe it or not) the stock 14b. Incredible! However when looking at both motors side by side you'll notice that the SR is a little bit better built. Connecting rods are a little beefier crank is a little bit bigger. Personaly I feel the newer mitsu's make better show cars than all out track machines. Although I love Diamond star motors and all the things they are capable of. I will say that well set up 240 w/ SR/KA-T will out perform an equally set up DSM in every way, including looks ![]() Last edited by Foxcolt; 12-27-2002 at 10:06 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Jax, Fl
Age: 43
Posts: 637
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Or if you want to save $4K you can get a S13 that is in good physical condition, with a blown engine, the do the S14a front end swap, and still have more money left over that can go into performance mods! That is what i would do, only b/c i think the rear end of a hatch looks so freaking good with the S14a front. I am not sure, but i thought the S13 is the better handling chassis out of the 240's. Please correct me if I am wrong though!
Man i wish i had a good bit of insurance money coming my way! DbD |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Age: 45
Posts: 2,263
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Leaky Injector
![]() Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: central coastal jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 116
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
i would go with the GSX. the 4g63 is (as previously stated) an incredible motor. its maybe one of the best turbocharged motor around. with simple bolt-on mods u will be up in the 300-350 mark. two of the big drawbacks are crankwalk where the crank moves very slightly and the tranny.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Zilvia Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Brunswick, CANADA
Age: 40
Posts: 246
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 39
Posts: 922
Trader Rating: (2)
![]() Feedback Score: 2 reviews
|
just came from the track yesterday...Sacramento Speedway that is...and there were a couple 240's...all zenki's and only one raced which got low 16.1. his reaction time was pretty bad though, above 2. there were also a couple dsm's there that raced. the quikest one was hitting 13.8.
iono if this is gonna help, but imo, DSMs are really quik, and thats pretty much all their meant to do. on a side note a mustang lost control and was drifting haha. his ass was lucky he didnt hit the side rails, he was about an inch or two away from it, swerving and almost hitting it about 5 times.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Yes, I look like that
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In my supervillain's lair
Posts: 27,980
Trader Rating: (19)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 19 reviews
|
Quote:
*EDIT: more to say... On the topic at hand, he didn't mention whether he was comparing 1st or second gen GSXs or S13s or S14s and the cost incurred with them will also be an issue... If he is simply planning on a swap, as S13 with a blown engine can be had for peanuts and you will spend little time undoing someone else's fuckups. On the same token, you can get a 95 or a 96 at a wonderful price if it has a few miles on it (again, swap/suspension, so it wouldn't matter as much) but I have noticed that 1st gen GSXs are many times ragged out, and the second generations are ungodly expensive (at least here in NC). Personally, as if anyone would be shocked, I say go with a 95-96 and go with the swap, or you can get a used KA (I paid 400 for engine/tranny and FOUND it had a low mile ACT stage 2) cheap to build up a KA-T for what you would spend on just the car for a second gen GSX... Last edited by Phlip; 03-06-2003 at 09:24 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 305
Trader Rating: (3)
![]() Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
I think a few years back Hyundai was using 4g63 Evo motors in their WRC rally car. Correct me if I am wrong but I m pretty sure thats what it was.
__________________
Drive it like you stole it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|