![]() |
|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#5 |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 41
Posts: 2,407
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (SR20Fastback @ July 10 2002,02:46)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Why is this in FAQ?</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
good point u got there... but compaired stock to stock, the fastest would be a 91 base coupe w/o option. the 91 had hotter cams, its actually same as nismo cams, just don't have NISMO printed on them. the 91 240 runs 0-60 in 7.9 sec other year, such as mine, 93, runs 0-60 in 8.3 sec the coupe is 50lbs lighter than the hatch if u compaire it w/ the same options. sun/moon roof adds quite a few weight A/C takes power away from the engine power window is heavier the 240 isn't a very fast car to start w/, so you must pick your opponent wisely. for examlpe, u run w/ a civic si that runs 0-60 in 6's, ur doomed, or a m3 that does 5's ur doomed, or a mclaren or bugattin, ur doomed for sure. now if u see a civic ex or ls, go for it
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|