![]() |
|
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
guys could you post or gimme a site that has the specs for both motors, need it really bad and soon. thanks
|
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thanks but i am looking for complete specs on the engine not just trq and Hp
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
BANNED
![]() |
Here is the SR specs...too lazy to get the KA
Sr red top.Displacement: 1998cc (2.0 liter) Cam type: DOHC 16 valve, chain driven cam sprockets Bore and stroke: 86mm x 86mm Compression: 8.5 : 1 Horsepower: 205hp at 6000rpm Torque: 203 ft/lbs at 4000rpm Stock boost: 7 psi Throttle body bore: 60mm Turbo: Garret T25 Injector size: 370cc/min (Edited by Kid Zelda at 3:56 pm on Nov. 21, 2001) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
thank you kid zelda thats exactly what i wanted. now i only need the KA, if you could PLEASE get them for me!!! oh and the second zelda for the nes was the tightest the first one for super nes was tight tOO!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
BANNED
![]() |
KA24DE specs....DooD
Engine: KA24DE Type: DOHC 16V I4 Displacement: 2389 cc Bore x Stroke: 89 mm x 96 mm Compression ratio: 9.5:1 Horsepower: 155 HP @ 5600 RPM Torque: 160 ft-lbs @ 4400 PRM Redline: 6900 RPM And I might as well give you the S15 Silvia specR Engine front engine, rwd turbocharged inline 4 DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder VTC, variable intake cam timing 1998 cc Horsepower 247 hp @ 6,400 rpm Torque 202 lb-ft @ 4,800 rpm Redline 7200 rpm Transimission 6 speed manual Curb Weight 2,799 lbs Overall Length 175.0 in Overall Width 66.7 in Height 50.6 in Wheelbase 99.4 in 1/4 mile 13.9 sec @ 100 mph Lateral Grip 0.95 g Braking 60-0 dist: 113 ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
I'm pretty new to the Nissan scene. In fact I just bought my 95 240Sx SE last week and have been enamored ever since. The car has quite a bit more TQ than my previous car (94 Ls Teg), but as always, it's never enough and I'd like to boost the engine once I get the suspension all sorted out.
Here's my question: why the fuss over the SR20DET? Sure it's a stock engine engineered for a turbo and should work well out of the box. But if anyone is going to seriously run a turbo bottom end work should be a foregone conclusion, so why is an SR20 preferred for boost than a built KA24? Seems to me that with a lower compression piston, better rods and an adequate fuel system, a KA series engine with it's bigger displacement should be able to run lower boost (less det probs) just as reliably and make as much or more power than an SR engine. Besides, with the larger output it's low end when it's off the boost shoul dbe much better as well as being able to push a bigger turbo no? Now if I am way off base please tell me. I am all about learning and making informed decisions esp when it comes to my car (my last car was my pride and joy). Many thanks and look forward to talking to ya'll at some point in the future. Rob |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
the ka will give more hp at lower boost (displacement always wins out), but it seems that the ppl running turbo ka's have reliability problems. there are a ton of turbo sr's so you'll have more ppl to get info from, and more ppl that can diagnose your problems
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|