![]() |
|
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
240 Dismantler
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Watkins Glen, NY
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: (7)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 7 reviews
|
![]() Like the title says, my block is warped and possibly cracked, I have access to an s13 block is it possible to put them together, or is there any disadvantages? thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#2 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
I dont personally know if they are compatible, but I do know that the s13 SR head flows better. They must have changed the s14 head some to help emmissions
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
240 Dismantler
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Watkins Glen, NY
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: (7)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 7 reviews
|
I know the heads are different, the s14 w/ vvt and low port vs s13 high port, but I had heard that the blocks were interchangeable and was wondering if it was true or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 4,103
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
Oil passage design prevents the two heads on being compatible, more over, the s14 head SUCKS. VVT FTL!!
__________________
[email protected] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: hella NORCAL!
Age: 39
Posts: 1,664
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
Sfourteen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: hella NORCAL!
Age: 39
Posts: 1,664
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
Quote:
IMO i dont think VTC on s14/s15 SR's is a bad thing.. My friend is running a s14sr, VTC makes up for what s13 sr's lack... not very good low end power.. (i hope you all know VTC is for low end.... not like honda's vtec) I know he has beat modded s13 SR's on freeway and all he has on his s14 sr is a cone filter and a 3" exhaust.. thats my experience with vtc.... but im sure its useless when people build a high HP S14sr and get some crazy cam that ditches vtc.
__________________
Sfourteen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Leaky Injector
|
You S14 SR haters dont know what your talking about. High port vs. low port is an insignificant issue. There's plenty of S14 SR's making power out there right with the S13 SR's. Do you think Nissan engineers would really redesign their engines to make them run less efficiently? I would say that any inefficiency they created by switching port designs would have more than made up for with the redesigned intake manifold. But we all put greddy intake manifolds on our motors anyways, so that's why its pretty much an insignificant difference as I see it.
__________________
http://photos.freshalloy.com/gallery/v/97+S14/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
240 Dismantler
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Watkins Glen, NY
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: (7)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 7 reviews
|
you can buy cams and gears that are compatable w/ vvt, so that's not a problem... anyways, I don't really care if you like vvt or the s14 motor in general, all I am looking to know is if I can put my s14 head on an s13 block which if johngriff is correct is not possible due to oil passage differences, can anyone back him up?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SoCal
Age: 35
Posts: 4,719
Trader Rating: (10)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 10 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Leaky Injector
|
Quote:
im guessing vtc is like vtec except its designed for low end torque? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: hella NORCAL!
Age: 39
Posts: 1,664
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
Quote:
and yes... VTC is for low to mid range torque if i didnt write it clearly before...
__________________
Sfourteen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 4,103
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
Maybe i just was not being clear.
In VAST experience with japanese, austrailian and american tuners, the VVT cam lobe switching system, has had MAJOR issues when changing cam profile when the motor is outputting more thatn 350ftlbs of tq before and during the cam switch. It has been known for snapping cams. Port/Intake manifold profiles did not even come up here. You can correct this issue by using one of the readily available VVT killer kits. I DONT want to get into any arguments over lag issues between these series. Mostly this is based on turbo and cam profiles, and a lack of preplanning when putting together a setup. DSG did quite a bit of preplanning with his settup and seems to have great response out of a Non VTC setup.
__________________
[email protected] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|