![]() |
|
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Spanish Fort, AL
Posts: 430
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Inverted Rear Coilovers
I am contemplating doing a DIY coilover setup with a set of Konis or Bilsteins (doing a rear Z32 upright swap, so need clevis style mounts). Since I will be building them from the ground up. I figured why not do an inverted setup. Yes, I know you have to use monotube shocks. Bilsteins are monotube and I believe the Koni Red inserts are as well. I know if using the Konis you would have to take the bottom of the shock off to adjust it (not that big of a deal). Do you think there would be enough clearance area for the spring to do inverted?
I am thinking it would be easier to fab up an inverted shock setup. Here's why: - The clevis style can be bought and simply screwed on the rod (takes car of that side. You would just need to weld a spring cap to the clevis end. - For the top side, you could use an aluminum housing (lighter weight) and have a stud put through the base to mount to the top of the strut towers. I am assuming (input needed on this) that you would weld or otherwise attach a camber plate to the base of the shock housing as well. The advantage of inverted also greatly lowers your sprung mass, combined with the aluminum uprights I am thinking you will get a huge unsprung weight savings. Please feel free to leave comments, I'm open to suggestions. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
Bookmarks |
|
|