Quote:
Originally Posted by Phlip
Tweets and insults are not "evidence" or even particularly compelling.
|
First of all, I never claimed everything I posted was "evidence". More like indicators that the election needs an audit. Maybe if you scanned through it, instead of writing it off, you'd see there's not just speculation but plenty of verified instances of 'glitches', errors, and fraud being acted upon by enforcement officials.
There's no amount of 'proof' that would satisfy the left, anyway. They just want what they want, country and its values be damned. Even if that means ignoring that the hallmark of our country is under attack. I'm not saying the right are angels with respect to integrity, but the left has
none.
If kicking out poll watchers and blocking the windows while only one party 'counts votes' isn't dubious and worthy of investigation, then I don't know what is. And since that actually happened, how is anyone supposed to prove fraud happened in that room?! If they, hypothetically, filled out official ballots for registered voters that didnt vote, or rescanned ballots somehow- how are you supposed to prove that if there was no poll watchers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RalliartRsX
I even posted a pic of one of the rulings above.
|
You are just
so illiterate. What you posted is the court of appeals asking for
specific information. That's not saying no evidence is available, and it
definitely doesn't say that the case is over, numb nuts.