My theory of time/time travel

[OrangeVirus1]

We can't travel back in time because we can't make atoms reverse there radioactive decay.

numbers are a man made thing. we can make them do anything we want. hell I am sure there is a possible way to make 2+2 = 3

Think about it this way, Lets say the Hydrogen molecules that were once apart of a Walking, living dinosaur, that dinosaur dies. over the years that hydrogen breaks up, becomes atoms, moves into a lake. lake dries up, hydrogen goes into the sky, rains down into the ocean and dries up 100,000x over, That same hydrogen atom gets sucked into your engine and burnt up upon combustion.


how the hell are you going to reverse that hydrogen back to that dinosaur. because if it wasn't the EXACT same atoms at the exact same atomic and molecular structure it is Not the same as it was before.

[turbobrick]

To the above post, hydrogen is an element and are atoms, not molecules. Well, there is molecular hydrogen, H2, but it can't bond to anything else and will be just hydrogen.


Anyway, the temperature of absolute zero is impossible. Also, there is something called the zero point energy, which basically is the lowest possible energy something can have. Because of that there will always be motion no matter how cold you get something.

[OrangeVirus1]

Originally Posted by turbobrick

To the above post, hydrogen is an element and are atoms, not molecules. Well, there is molecular hydrogen, H2, but it can't bond to anything else and will be just hydrogen.


Anyway, the temperature of absolute zero is impossible. Also, there is something called the zero point energy, which basically is the lowest possible energy something can have. Because of that there will always be motion no matter how cold you get something.

you know what I meant Atoms, molecules etc..

[paintkilz]

only issue with the theory is youre regarding time as a factor. Theres plenty of science now that shows time is only a factor in this reality/dimension.


theres a lot of talk that einsteins theorys were not what they are claimed to be and leave a lot to be questioned regarding theoretical physics..especially getting into higher order phyics like string theory or most quantum fields...

[One_love_silvia]

Originally Posted by turbobrick

To the above post, hydrogen is an element and are atoms, not molecules. Well, there is molecular hydrogen, H2, but it can't bond to anything else and will be just hydrogen.


Anyway, the temperature of absolute zero is impossible. Also, there is something called the zero point energy, which basically is the lowest possible energy something can have. Because of that there will always be motion no matter how cold you get something.

nothing is impossible my friend. at one point in time, it was impossible for man to travel to the moon. at one point in time, it was impossible for humans to fly, now we can. At one point in time, it was impossible that the earth was round.

I believe it was Thomas Edison who tried like 1000 ways to create a light bulb and failed. It didn't mean it was impossible, it just meant there was 1000 ways it wasn't possible. You have to discover the possible way to go about doing things.

TL;DR version: Nothing is impossible. It's just a matter of how you go about doing it, that makes it possible

[Celli]

Originally Posted by One_love_silvia

nothing is impossible my friend. at one point in time, it was impossible for man to travel to the moon. at one point in time, it was impossible for humans to fly, now we can. At one point in time, it was impossible that the earth was round.

I believe it was Thomas Edison who tried like 1000 ways to create a light bulb and failed. It didn't mean it was impossible, it just meant there was 1000 ways it wasn't possible. You have to discover the possible way to go about doing things.

TL;DR version: Nothing is impossible. It's just a matter of how you go about doing it, that makes it possible

I love the optimism and all buuuuut... That's not really logical. There are plenty of things impossible. Is time travel? Idk. Absolute zero? Probably. Just like the speed of light. Theoretically, if mass were to reach the speed of light, it would lose all properties of mass and literally BECOME light. That would also be breaking newtons laws of physics "mass can neither be created nor destroyed" turning mass to light=mass destroyed.

See where I'm going?