![]() |
|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,764
Trader Rating: (5)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 5 reviews
|
Quote:
Reading comprehension? What's that? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#2 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawai'i Nei
Age: 34
Posts: 628
Trader Rating: (8)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
What happened to this thread? lamo
__________________
Quote:
* PigNose SMIC Grille/Vent P# 62697-44F00 * LMK What you guys got ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
the destroking kit sounds like the way to got for ultimate power.
when you destroke a motor the average piston speed goes down, allowing you to safely rev higher. That, combined with a super aggressive cam, oversized valves, 14-15:1 pistons and individual throttle bodies would definitely give the flow and revs needed to make all that power. not to mention underdrive pulleys, race tuned headers, electric fans etc. any flaws i am missing here? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
wow you got your panties all in a bunch over what, wow dude chill the eFF out, thanks for the neg. rep, thats so cool. you rock.
many people mentioned the GT2/3 cars running 300HP all motor KAs and THAT IS WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO you fucking douchebag. an all motor KA that is comparable in power to an LS1 will cost MORE than the LS1, imho. lol you are messed up in the head man, or you think the LS1 swaps are hard as hell and uber expensive... Ive done LS1 swaps so I have a bit of knowledge on the subject, but you, are you being a bitter dreamer or just a douche today. posts like yours with hysterical negativity and no room for humor are just another reason the intArweb sucks. lol. you fail.
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
Check this out guys,
http://www.race-cars.com/engsales/ot...59606209ss.htm gives a lot of the specs, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 9,006
Trader Rating: (106)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 106 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
a well done LS1 swap is just that, a swap, were not talking about modifying an LS1, especially when considering a budget build and last I check the stock LS1 puts down about 300hp. I know in the process of swapping one into a 240sx you can run a more free flowing exhaust, special headers and a nice CAI but without other mods like t/b porting and a bigger intake, etc you are not going to see 400hp. so a basic LS1 swap will still be pushing about 300hp. yeah yeah yeah you can start with an LS2 or LS6 and you can buildup an LS1 with mods galore to see whatever hp level you want but for this discussion it was just a noteworthy idea to think about a very simple, very basic, LS1 swap for a better financial option to a 300hp n/a KA motor setup.
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 9,006
Trader Rating: (106)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 106 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
BigVinnie, youre making a lot of sense, good stuff.
hey thats not my fault, or even what I am talking about for the sake of the thread. at least compare apples to apples and not your dreamy dream setup from the far away future. even saing that, theres no reason someone couldnt do all of the same stuff to maximize a N/A KA24E buildup, like dry sump oiling, altered subframe to reduce cg, etc!!!!!!!!!!!! and that is just one more reason your LS1 swap isnt done yet. if you did a simple swap you would be blown away by the performance and not be held up with eleventy billion things to modify and go wrong and tune and dial in. trust me, out of the 5 local LS1FCs, 2 of us went simple while the other guys spent thousands of dollars on extra mods and special fuel setups and tuning, blah blah blah, they all had so much downtime because of mods and issues from such a complicated buildup, I just enjoy driving and how much faster does this car need to be, its already stupidfast.
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
Quote:
I also drive a stock KA with just intake headers and exhaust and mostly all of the suspension parts so don't think I'm power hungry. And yes I think more horsepower will do me a lot of good and make my lap times go a lot quicker from where I am at now. This is an awesome thread, I like reading about what people have to say about N/A KA's or LS1 swaps or whatevers. Very interesting and at times very funny haha.
__________________
http://www.amazon.com/gp/prod Amazon book! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
hahahaha I could not stop laughing at this post lol good good point over racepar he got
![]() ![]() Building engines aren't cheap let alone building a fully built N/A motor. To be putting out 300hp on a KA I would think it would need to be rebuilt very often. So the cost of getting a KA to 300hp and the maintenance wouldn't even be worth it unless you have a big budget to play with. Quote:
__________________
http://www.amazon.com/gp/prod Amazon book! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
rofl.
in all of that jibberish you fail to even mention how much the GT3 spec all motor 300hp KA would cost... so how are you making a comparison at all? FAIL. I would not fear saying that a GT3 spec 300hp KA would be very expensive... thats a race motor and damn thats not cheap. my '98 LS1T56 dropout was $2500. I even went balls out and paid $800 to have my LS1 harness reworked and PCM tuned. um, to get that into a 240 is not that difficult even if you buy parts, and you still get to SELL THE KA that you arent using any more. I mention a '98 LS1 because theyre cheap and they are pushing the same hp that the GT3 KA motors are pushing, so its an apples to apples hp comparison and thus the cost is the item in discussion. the misc. parts needed to have the car up and running are just peanuts, chump change, when you consider the RACE PARTS and tuning up the fucking WAZOOO that you'd need to churn out 300hp from a KA. or did you want to stoke your KA as well and have that super rare rotating assembly on your list of items to purchase so you can have a $10,000 300hp KA? um, did you even think about the beefing up you'd need to do to the KA tranny to relaibly push 300hp thru it? or were you going to run a Z32 trans and an adapter and all that crap, that costs BUTTLOADS of money. why so bent over my "bumping the thread", wtf, its not like it was a dead month old thread. I never said I didnt like the KA and quite the contrary, stop making assumtions on my beliefs, wtf. I am the last guy who would be an LS1 nazi. ya know what, people were discussing the costs involved, LS1 got mentioned, I added my 2cents with humor and you FAIL to realize that. and another thing, if you think a GT3 spec KA is less complicated than a bare bones LS1 swap in a 240sx, well then I have news for you, its not. go find a competent shop and ask them to price out a 300hp KA setup with a tranny and bolt ons that will endure that and support the power, then dont be surprised when its almost twice as costly as swapping in an early-gen LS1T56 setup to get the same power and even better gearing. yeah I know the thread was about n/a KA but threads evolve beyond the initial post, dont they? whatever. fucking forum police yay!
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
so someone posted then erased it but -
"check this out" - http://www.race-cars.com/engsales/ot...59606209ss.htm yeah NO SHIT! "This is a race ready SCCA GT3 engine. Does not include flywheel, clutch, or mag PU bracket and carbs. These parts are available for additional cost" on top of the SIXTY FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! racepar = fail.
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: rochester ny
Age: 36
Posts: 80
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Just dropping by. I've weighed options, N/A, RB, KA-T, SR20, LS1, and I've driven almost all of them (gotten rides in others). Bang for the buck, if you don't mind not being a "purist" and being a complete and utter "failure" then LS1 is pretty siqq.
Owen you FIAL. ![]()
__________________
- Tim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: rochester ny
Age: 36
Posts: 80
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
And yeah, for a siqq nasty N/A build (rough prices, even worse estimates than yours, racepar):
Pistons 500 Rods 400 Flywheel 300 Clutch / PP 500 Valves / Springs / Retainers 300 Cams 600 ECU / AEM EMS (gotta make it run?) 500-1700 Machining (headwork gets expensive?) 500+ Stickers 5 So that's 4000+ dollars for <225 horsepower. Just my two cents.
__________________
- Tim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 9,006
Trader Rating: (106)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 106 reviews
|
$6400 is a bargain for a race-ready longblock. Ever seen the prices for a formula atlantic spec 4ag from an engine builder? It'll make you have a heart attack. With an LS1 swap it is not hard to spend around $7000-$10,000. Yes you can do it cheaper if you hunt for deals and/or have hookups. But you can build your own GT3 spec KA longblock for cheaper if you hunt for deals and/or have hookups too. It is no cheaper to do an LS1 swap then it is to build a badass KA, PERIOD. I am "policing" (as you say) this thread because it WAS a good thread. Good discussions on what it takes to make a KA badass, and that is the whole point here. Now it has turned into the same old crap, a discussion on what the best N/A motor is. The KA is not the best motor in the world, we all know that, but it IS a good motor.
TIMSTER: $4000+ for a 225hp motor sounds EXACTLY like a SR to me! People spend that kind of money for that kind of power on SR's all the time (including the swap)! What makes the KA not worthy? A 200hp N/A KA will absouluely OWN a 200hp SR because the KA 1: has more torque 2: is a n/a motor and therefore has better response than a turbo motor (assuming the tuning is well done). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: western, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 531
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
imho the SR's (w/coil packs) and LS1's both have better ignition than the KA, stock for stock and I think the LS1 wins hands down in the stock computers tuning capabilites and low costs of tuning.
__________________
cardomain.com/id/LS1T56FC = my crazy ls1 v8 rx7 = sold |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 9,006
Trader Rating: (106)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 106 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Diego
Age: 41
Posts: 4,249
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
only problem with NA sr is that those of us in the US have to invest into atleast 2k just to get the motor and then your going to have to invest into the build.
And I bet you good money that he spent more than 6k just to have 220 NA hp where is that 200hp na ka for about 1k link?
__________________
Drives a BRZ and is building a V6 S12 coupe. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Diego
Age: 41
Posts: 4,249
Trader Rating: (4)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 4 reviews
|
its stupid to compare a 4cyl to a V-anything your ignoring the simple fact that it has more cylinder it will always be easier to make more power with more cylinders
__________________
Drives a BRZ and is building a V6 S12 coupe. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Zilvia Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sandy Eggo
Age: 37
Posts: 168
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
200 hp is weaksauce for that kind of money.
ls1 w/tranny ~ 500 ka24de w/tranny ~ 450 ka's are heavy as shit
__________________
This sig was inspired by nothing, then is wasn't. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: rochester ny
Age: 36
Posts: 80
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I fail at multiquoting, so I'm not going to bother.
Racepar: That was a low estimate pricewise and a high estimate with horsepower. And really? N/A is more responsive than Turbo? I thought you had to build vacuum with a N/A. irax: Then why do people say the replacement for displacement is boost? Just messing with you, but if you're going to consider one (KA) then you've got to consider the other (LSx). They've got their pros and cons, and to each their own I suppose. flood: Fail. Look at the title again. I'll reiterate for you. "All motor 240 ideas." Not all motor KA ideas, not all large letter / bold / oblivious answers. Edit: Don't take me for some KA hater. I've got one in the car now, and I've got one in the garage. I've got enough stuff to make two more KA powered 240s. I'm a car guy, though, and I like all around cars. I'm a fan of the KA engine, simply because of how it's progressed in the past few years, but I won't be going that route with my car.
__________________
- Tim |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 9,006
Trader Rating: (106)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 106 reviews
|
Sorry dude, but an LS1 engine with trans, clutch and flywheel, and all pumps and accessories weighs significantly less than a KA with all the same stuff on it.
Quote:
1: Iron block- An iron block is more durable and handles high cylinder pressures and heat better. This means more boost or compression. 2: More reliable valvetrain- Since the KA's have the cams pushing directly on the bucket lifters instead of the stupid SR rocker arms there are less moving parts and less potential problems. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|