![]() |
|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
LOUD NOISES A place for political mudslinging, Pro/Anti legalization, gay marriage debate, Gun control rants, etc. If it's political, controversial, or hotly debated, it goes here. No regular Off-Topic stuff allowed. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 45
Posts: 1,700
Trader Rating: (15)
![]() Feedback Score: 15 reviews
|
Might piss some people off but oh well.
What is the most popular solution to an animal/species problem when it either outgrows its habitat, over eats and destroys its habitat or becomes a general nuisance?
We setup hunting seasons, issue hunting licenses and just find out ways to exterminate (solve) the problem. Why cant this be done with people? I mean lots of people fit these same categorys, and we can justify killing lots and lots of animals to solve a problem so why cant it be done with people? And please dont give me the obvious "we're the top of the food chain" crap or "we're human and they're just animals", even within humans there is a pecking order like strongest/weakest, smartest/dumbest. Also please take this question with a grain of salt, its a hypothetical question I though about while watching the pig bomb documentary (if thats what you call it) on history or discovery.....I cant remember. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|