![]() |
|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbus, GA
Age: 44
Posts: 24
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
My baseline Dynorun
Untuned Blue@9psi Red@13psi
90 Nissan 240SX Redtop SR20DET Swap 24x12x3 FMIC Stock T25 Turbo Apexi Twin Chamber BOV 3" Greddy Downpipe Apexi N1 Muffler & Custom 3" Exhaust Equal Length Exhaust Manifold Blowthru Z32 MAF setup Koyo Aluminum Radiator Apexi S-AFC Greddy Profec B Boost Controller |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#4 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() |
Z32 MAF located after the turbo but before the throttle body, as opposed to a flow-through setup where the MAF is located before the turbo. It's beneficial for people who run atmospheric blow-off valves, as it doesn't meter air that gets blown off which would typically cause a rich condition.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
Quote:
someone elses numbers with x mods doesnt necessarily translate into your cars numbes with the same mods. my old setup (stock everything w/ 3" exhaust, FMIC, and 14psi) made 255hp and 250tq.
__________________
90 S13:............fitter, happier, more productive. 04 Yamaha R1: 210rwhp on gas/161rwhp on motor |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
Quote:
very true, also depends on the dyno used too, some are more accurate then others. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Zilvia Member
![]() |
pretty smooth curve, not all jumpy so im guessing the a/f was smooth but i bet ur afc will pull a few more ponies out...i like the 13 psi numbers much better haha. i have close to the same set up, but have a 20x12x3 core, no afc, stock maf. and soon to have a boost controller...even have same year car as you. you should let me know how tuning goes with the safc and what kind of numbers you get then, i was considering getting one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
If the car was dyno'd on either a mustang or dynojet the "some are more accurate than others" thing doesnt really hold up. and that looks like a dynojet graph to me.
the curve looking so smooth is also an option in the software........a "smooth" curve doesnt necessarily indicate anything without knowing how the dynos been setup
__________________
90 S13:............fitter, happier, more productive. 04 Yamaha R1: 210rwhp on gas/161rwhp on motor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbus, GA
Age: 44
Posts: 24
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
unfortunately the current setup won't see tuning... I'm in the process of buying a GT25R(GT25/40r) and 72lb injectors. That is the setup that'll be tuned in. I'll post new charts when that happens. Should be in Sept sometime...
BTW - My turbo was gone on the above pulls. It smokes like a big dog. I don't see full boost until 3800-4000rpm. I think that has something to do with it. I have a very clean stock T25 turbo that I was going to throw on in the meantime but I figured if I replace the stock turbo I might as well upgrade... Taking these things off in the car proves to be a B!tC#!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
its far easier to replace the turbo by removing the manifold. its not even possible to do it with it in the car with a stock manifold. at any rate, its only about 15 mins work to pull it all anyway.
__________________
90 S13:............fitter, happier, more productive. 04 Yamaha R1: 210rwhp on gas/161rwhp on motor |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbus, GA
Age: 44
Posts: 24
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|