![]() |
|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Just for the record I had strongly considered trying the MH muscke car drags for street/strip use. As they are a wrinkle wall bias ply and not a radial but they don't have the size I'm looking for.
I don't think the 235 will be wide enough and think a 26in tall tire is taller than needed.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#6 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OKC, OK
Age: 36
Posts: 54
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
tom n- you really should read to what is being typed to you and read the specs for what ever tire you want...and just for the record a 24.5x8 has a smaller tread width then a 235 tire...stop debating bias vs radial it doesnt really matter if your looking for a bias ply tire
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
The 24.5x8.5 has a tread width of 8.5 The 235 has a tread width of 7.5 What were you saying againg?
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OKC, OK
Age: 36
Posts: 54
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
24.5x8.5=8.5" tread width 235=8.4" so that .1 is basically a wash and with a 24.5" tire your not going to get the side wall flex you are after unless you have very low tire pressure as previously stated but i do agree with the bias vs radial thing |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
The 235 muscle car drags that we're posted are a 7.5 in tread. I'm not really looking for a dot tire though. I have drag radials for street use. Looking for a full slick.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Leaky Injector
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
In 20years of racing I've never seen a sanctioned race say no bias ply radials. That would make no damn sense. You have bias ply DOT & non DOT And you have radial DOT and non DOT. Such as a non dot radial slick.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Leaky Injector
|
First time for everything I guess. I have seen them say DOT approved radials, non bias ply only. Either way a 24.5x8.5 seems like a rather small size for a rwd car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
I'm looking to argue what a radial is. It's a stupid discussion for 3 year olds.
I've calculated gearing for a 26 and a 24.5 and the 24.5 seems like a better fit but was looking for some real world use in a 400hp S14. Is there such a person here?
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
A dot approved radial non bias ply only makes perfect sense.
A radial is a non bias ply and most all radials are dot aside from a very specific radial slick like made by MT which isn't DOT. For example a nitto 555r would be a non bias ply DOT radial. Yes a 24.5 does seam small for a rwd as most out there aren't smaller imports. That's the point if the original question. In this case is the 26 warranted on a car like this one. There was a S13 at the track Saturday with a stock red top swap cutting 1.6 60fts on a 22in slick. He got them for free. Got me thinking how a 24.5 would work. I'm looking for just enough tire. Not more than I need as that's added weight and rolling resistance.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Leaky Injector
|
Right, but if you say DOT radial, there should be no need to specify non bias ply since they make no bias ply radials. Either way, I'm done thread jacking. Here's a video of me going 11.91 in my brother's LS1 240 on I think a 255/60/16 to get back on topic. http://youtu.be/sBZXDgP9dxY
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
I agree there no reason to say non bias ply if it mandates a radial. I guess it's for those who think radial mean dot? What was the 60ft? And what rpm did he cross the line at?
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Leaky Injector
|
I was driving for that run, and I think the 60 ft was a 1.7. It crossed the line at the very top of 4th, around 7000 rpms, but the longer gearing in the Q45 rear has fixed that. Now just to get back to the track and try it out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
Top of 4th if its a 1:1 gear with that tall a tire would put you at a pretty high trap speed. I want to trap using most of 4th. Right now I trap in the low/mid 120's with a 275/45/16 which is about 25.5in tall. But I'm not using most of 4th when I cross.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Leaky Injector
|
Quote:
Edit: What kind of times are you running with a trap speed that high? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
Car traps high 11's with radials and crappy 60fts.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Leaky Injector
|
Quote:
And are you wanting to improve your times, or just get better trap speed? Because we dropped half a second off our times by cutting the 60 ft down .2. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OKC, OK
Age: 36
Posts: 54
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
3.9 vlsd from a n/a z32 or maybe a J30. Forget which it was from.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
Tom is right guys.. radials are steel belted construction. bias ply are nylon.. hense why they hook better.. more flex.. radials are harder on drive train parts because they don't absorb shock nearly as good.. radials drive better on the street..
Tom I got you.. fuck these retards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: OKC, OK
Age: 36
Posts: 54
Trader Rating: (1)
![]() Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
3.9...give the 24.5 a try but if you decide to up your rear end ratio you will also have to extend your redline or buy new tires again... i assume your not running a s15 6 speed
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
S15 trans went bye bye long ago. It has a regular SR 5 speed.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gardnerville,NV
Posts: 2,515
Trader Rating: (105)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 105 reviews
|
To those of you running Weld rims, what length shank lug nuts are you running? Are you guys running stock wheel studs?
__________________
PM me for s13 or s14 parts! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
1 3/8in shank. You should use a stud that's a little longer than stock. Convert to a m12x1.5 stud. Easier to get the lugs for welds in that size/pitch then the 12x1.25 Nissan uses.
__________________
98 240sx w/ S15 SR20DET, T2 20g, 11.22 @ 124.98 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gardnerville,NV
Posts: 2,515
Trader Rating: (105)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 105 reviews
|
I was hoping I could use the stock studs because I daily drive the car and I have a different set of wheels for the street. I did find the shank lugs in 12x1.25, so that's not a problem.
__________________
PM me for s13 or s14 parts! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|