KopBusters

[tunersedge]

Originally Posted by Matej

Hate pro-weed people, and their 'eye-opening' stunts. The pro-marijuana campaign is even more annoying than the anti-smoking commercials.

the pro-marijuana campaign is annoying? how about a government that bans smoking a plant that has been around for thousands of years, if someone wants to do drugs let them do drugs, who the fuck is anyone to step in and say what they are doing is "wrong".

Who knows if the human consciousness would be at where its at today without the use of psychoactive substances.

drugs are good and bad, good to be experimented with and bad if they are abused.

To say you hate pro-weed people is just ignorant, everyone would be pro-weed if the idea that it was bad wasn't shoved down your throat at a young age.

[VROOOM]

Originally Posted by 240cracker

damn i would do this!

so many cops do fucked up shit...
just the other day they were chasing my friend and when they got up to him he dropped to the floor and and put his hands behind his back but the cop kicked him straight in the face anyways

he has a scar for life now from his lip to his chin

if he wouldnt have been stupid and ran, he never would have gotten kicked.
seems your friend is a fucking idiot.

[Not You]

Originally Posted by Sleepy240

Have you ever been busted for nothing? Cause I know I sure as hell haven't. IMO most of these are isolated incidents in a very small percentage of overall arrests. But of course people get their panties in a bunch because they were "treated unfairly". It's the flaw with the system but I'm safe and am happy for the police in my area.



Wrong, and wrong. A warrant is NOT required for a phone tap. All they legally need is "just cause". Not to mention to get a specific warrant for a phone tap is nothing more than a mere phone call. They have judges specifically for these warrants. On top of that they now have "roving wire taps" which extend to all devices that the person owns (ie. Your computer, E-Mails, Cellphones, Land lines, Work Computers etc). No kind of a surveillance is illegal, because it is just surveillance. The second they go to ACT on that surveillance is when they require a warrant or it is illegal (at least not admissible in court). I find there to be far more UPSTANDING law abiding cops than crooked law breaking cops. There are crooked people in any line of work should that skew your view of everybody? No.

Originally Posted by VROOOM

if he wouldnt have been stupid and ran, he never would have gotten kicked.
seems your friend is a fucking idiot.

The Largest Street Gang in America Video by BoilingFrogs - MySpace Video

Realy? Still think because someone breaks a law but is willing to comply and accept the consequences he/she should be fucking kicked/beaten/tazed. Thats bullshit, if a cop pulled you over for speeding and you were complying but he ripped you out of the car and beat the shit out of you and said "He was speeding to avoid arrest and I felt like he may have been armed" that makes it ok?

[ronmcdon]

Yeah I would have to agree it was uncalled for the officer to assault anyone,
unless they felt their safety or anyone else's were at risk.

Officer could have booked that dude running away for 'obstruction of justice',
but to kick the dude in the face is uncalled for.
I am also quite certain that's not official procedure.
I'm sure there was a more professional way to handle such an incident.

This is why these vids are good.
If the cop was filmed kicking the dude in the face,
I very much doubt he would have gone off so easy (If that were the case).

Let's let the judge (if not also the media) decide if it's still ok,
when you have the evidence to prove the officer's questionable judgment.

[S14_Kouki]

Originally Posted by Not You

The Largest Street Gang in America Video by BoilingFrogs - MySpace Video

Realy? Still think because someone breaks a law but is willing to comply and accept the consequences he/she should be fucking kicked/beaten/tazed. Thats bullshit, if a cop pulled you over for speeding and you were complying but he ripped you out of the car and beat the shit out of you and said "He was speeding to avoid arrest and I felt like he may have been armed" that makes it ok?

How can anyone have respect for cops after watching this. Yes there are some good cops, but the bad cop over weigh the good cops. I feel so upset right now

[Matej]

Originally Posted by tunersedge

the pro-marijuana campaign is annoying? how about a government that bans smoking a plant that has been around for thousands of years, if someone wants to do drugs let them do drugs, who the fuck is anyone to step in and say what they are doing is "wrong".

Who knows if the human consciousness would be at where its at today without the use of psychoactive substances.

drugs are good and bad, good to be experimented with and bad if they are abused.

To say you hate pro-weed people is just ignorant, everyone would be pro-weed if the idea that it was bad wasn't shoved down your throat at a young age.

No one shoved anything down my throat.
Weed is for middle school kids.

[ryguy]

Originally Posted by Sleepy240

I find there to be far more UPSTANDING law abiding cops than crooked law breaking cops.

Funny, I find the exact opposite. Most cops are to one degree or another power hungry pigs that get off on their own authority.

[DALAZ_68]

Originally Posted by S14_Kouki

Why does a car meet have to mean we are street racing?? and im pretty sure we can call the cops pretty much anything we want theres this thing called freedom of speech

because...no matter how good you control people at a meet theres always that one idiot

and no...you cant... its called verbally assaulting an officer
and it is not reasonable for an officer to be offended by this, unless it was intended to provoke.

If that is the case, and the words are intended to provoke or disturb, you can be arrested. The US Supreme Court decided this in Chaplinski v. New Hampshire, commonly called the "Fighting Words Doctrine". The Court determined words intended to cause a disturbance are not covered by the First Amendment.

Originally Posted by ryguy

Funny, I find the exact opposite. Most cops are to one degree or another power hungry pigs that get off on their own authority.

sounds like u needa move

[BustedS13]

Originally Posted by Not You

YouTube - TX Cops Get Busted

YouTube - Kop Busters Raid - Raw Footage

Civilians are setting up "stings" after one of there friends was wrongfully imprisioned for alleged marijuana trafficing. There setting up fake grow operations and busting cops for illegally tapping phones, helicopter surveillance, illegal search warrants, entrapment, etc.

I think it's great that there fighting back against shady cops violating citizens rights. What are your views?

there
their
they're

all of these are different.


i also hate pro-weed shenanigans. bunch of hippies and chodes.
i'm all for legalization but the people who generally put the most work into it are just setting it back by years. see the marijuana thread in this subforum for examples of people who shouldn't voice their opinion on the matter.

LEGALIZE IT DOODS SMOKE WEED EVERYDAY
I WANNA MARRY JANE
LOL

[ryguy]

Originally Posted by DALAZ_68

sounds like u needa move

It's never been a problem for me, but I work at a place that holds a lot of events for different police precincts, and we probably see 2,000+ officers per year. The city has a STRICT smoking ban in ALL public places, yet the police are the ONLY people who we work for that still smoke like crazy wherever they can do it out of our view. It's small things like that that I have personally seen, I've never been a victim of abuse, but I have seen that they all think they're above the law.

[S14_Kouki]

Originally Posted by DALAZ_68

because...no matter how good you control people at a meet theres always that one idiot

and no...you cant... its called verbally assaulting an officer
and it is not reasonable for an officer to be offended by this, unless it was intended to provoke.

If that is the case, and the words are intended to provoke or disturb, you can be arrested. The US Supreme Court decided this in Chaplinski v. New Hampshire, commonly called the "Fighting Words Doctrine". The Court determined words intended to cause a disturbance are not covered by the First Amendment.

There is sometimes that one person but what about the other times not every time there are stupid ppl. If I dont have the freedom to say how I feel then that means we as a nation on longer have that first amendment. Thats so stupid cause if you said anything the cop did not like even if you cant get in trouble for it then its his word against yours and the cop always wins if you dont have proof.