Zilvia Gun Thread

[lunchmeat]

Now you know how I feel when I see you damn Canadians with your cars we can't have till they're 25 years old and shitty.

[Jefro240]

Originally Posted by lunchmeat

Now you know how I feel when I see you damn Canadians with your cars we can't have till they're 25 years old and shitty.

But at least you can have them once they are 25 years old. No matter what, I'll never be able to own an AK, Fal, Thompson etc etc. And just to show you how ridiculous it really is...

Mossberg Blaze = Non restricted, not registered, police technically do not know who owns them...

Mossberg Blaze 47 = Prohibited - Claimed to be a "Variant of the Kalashnikov AK 47" by the RCMP.

Both are the exact same firearm. One has a plastic casing that "looks" like an AK which sandwiches the action/barrel. The other sits in a synthetic stock.

At least your government sets the rule you have to follow. With us, it is the RCMP creating fake policies which the government allow them to get away with under the pretext "they know best".

For example, the RCMP have recently come out with a term "dual purpose" for magazines. We are limited to 10 rounds in pistols. 5 rounds in center fire rifles. Rimfire rifles are unlimited. Now they claim Bulter Creek 30 round steel lip magazines were designed for the Ruger Charger Pistol and pistols are limited to 10 rounds. So if a magazine is capable of being used in both a Rifle & Pistol, it must be limited to the lowest round count. So all butler creek mags now need to be pinned to 10 rounds or we are in possession of prohibited devices. So the 10/22 was released in 1964. Butler Creek mags released in 1978. Charger released in 2007. So how was the magazine designed in 1978 for a pistol that didnt exist?

Government response... We trust the RCMP to do what is best for public safety.

I wish we had rights instead of privileges.