Quote:
Originally Posted by KA24DESOneThree
That's not your argument. Your argument is that I "want mandated government housing." You don't get to move the goalposts every time you forget how to read.
I specifically said the following: "That's not what I'm advocating. I'm advocating for zoning laws to be heavily relaxed and for a developer to get a tax break (aren't they called stimulus?) to build housing."
This is why I'm not going to go through the effort of trying to teach you anything- because you will instantly move the goalposts and say "nuh uh, this is what I was saying." You have no interest in being correct, you only have an interest in drawing out whatever it is until whoever you're arguing with loses interest and you get to move onto some other inane fucking talking point that you read on Patriot Post.
Fucking potato.
|
Except naw bruh. I SEE want your are typing but I "UNDERSTAND" what you are meaning.
You can dress it up however you want but your end goal is to eliminate personnel transportation and heard everyone into dense high-rise living conditions.
You'll use arguments of environmental protection, equality, efficiency, etc.
You are trying to make it a "Libertarian" argument by saying your relaxing regulations (zoning) and supporting businesses (subsidizing construction). Then when people's property values crash you'll use eminent domain to "free market aquire" their homes for more planned development.
That's simply Socialist Bullshit. Your fucking over people rights to private property to pander to those without property while helping increase the wealth gap with crony construction contracts.
By rezoning you are trying to strip people of their property protection and wealth. You're then giving our tax money to wealth investment development groups, much of which are owned by the Chinese today. Your plan is a massive wealth consolidation and step towards collectivism.
Corbic's idea of a nice home:
And your proposal....
