![]() |
|
LOUD NOISES A place for political mudslinging, Pro/Anti legalization, gay marriage debate, Gun control rants, etc. If it's political, controversial, or hotly debated, it goes here. No regular Off-Topic stuff allowed. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Yes, I look like that
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In my supervillain's lair
Posts: 27,980
Trader Rating: (19)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 19 reviews
|
Quote:
As of when you posted this, the two memory card contained 5213 in person (not those fraudulent mail-in ones) votes that had not been previously counted. Of the 5213, 3220 were for the incumbent, which is a little under 62%. [link] From the link, they were at the time investigating uncounted votes from a third county which involves a WHOPPING 224 votes. And since I know you won't read the link because it does not contain a minor technicality that will continue to feed your narrative until the bloody end, I will quote why this is another nothingburger: Quote:
[link] What that means, as explained today by NPR: while the recount found previously uncounted votes and some were indeed for the incumbent, there were also some for the challenger. Given that both candidates ultimately added to their vote totals, the one who was behind in the initial count did not add substantially enough votes to change the outcome. If the president and his lapdog Lindsey Graham had succeeded in getting Georgia to simply shitcan tens of thousands of legal votes. Alas, what they thought would be a friendly audience was not willing to comply with their attempted disenfranchisement. Officials in GA were confident that it would not materially change the outcome all along. We will have official results of the recount by noon today, they say. |
||
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|