Donald Trump For President

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by rvns14

Ever live in an apartment? If your next door neighbors don’t keep clean and get roaches, you get roaches too (there aren’t even any physical barriers between Chicago and Indiana).



But you are right numbers don’t lie. 70% of the time numbers are right 100% of the time.

So that's why Gary and South Bend have drug and gang problems.

But once again, how is it Indiana and Wisconsin's fault Chicago is a shit show? They are the ones spreading roaches.

[gbaby2089]

nopenopenope

[rvns14]

Originally Posted by Corbic

So that's why Gary and South Bend have drug and gang problems.

But once again, how is it Indiana and Wisconsin's fault Chicago is a shit show? They are the ones spreading roaches.

Buh buh buh buh what about unicorns!!!!
Talking about Chicago and where guns come from, not Gary Southbend.
The general problem with large American cities is a lack of urban planning, cities are not designed in ways that increase their sustainability and become better as they grow larger. That is due to not fully effective development laws (Houston floods on sunny days full of development in flood areas) and the non investment in public services. Cities keep the poor trapped in city centers, without a car in many cities, well paying suburban jobs are difficult to get. Democrats are certainly as corrupt as any other politicians are but a central tenant of democratic policy is not to reduce taxes that pay for public services.
MDs rep gov repaved roads in western Maryland and cut funding to a rail service for the west side of Baltimore that would have served tens of thousands who work at social security (and others). Just poor planning.

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by rvns14

.

The general problem with large American cities is a lack of urban planning, cities are not designed in ways that increase their sustainability and become better as they grow larger.

Why? Who's fault is that? What evidence supports a cause / effect relationship. How about move?

Originally Posted by rvns14

That is due to not fully effective development laws and the non investment in public services.

Why is that? Who makes those laws and why haven't they? What are they doing with all that money they get? Last I checked big cities are notorious for an abundance of bureaucracy and laws regarding development.

Originally Posted by rvns14

Cities keep the poor trapped in city centers, without a car in many cities, well paying suburban jobs are difficult to get.

How do they trap them? Are there walls and guards? Why can't they get a $1000 car or a $350 scooter or a $25 bicycle? Why don't they leave the city? I'd Hazzard a guess that rural poor need a car more then the urban poor, they somehow manage.

Originally Posted by rvns14

Democrats are certainly as corrupt as any other politicians are but a central tenant of democratic policy is not to reduce taxes that pay for public services.

Okay... That's also code for "need to protect thier cronnie supporters, the city unions and workers"

Originally Posted by rvns14

MDs rep gov repaved roads in western Maryland and cut funding to a rail service for the west side of Baltimore that would have served tens of thousands who work at social security (and others). Just poor planning.

Uh huh... So the Governor made sure those paying taxes had roads to get to work. If rail service to Westside Baltimore is in such hot demand, it should be a profitable endeavor, are private companies lining up to seize the opportunity?


You've listed a bunch of excuses, not actual root causes.

[gbaby2089]

nopenopenope

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by gbaby2089

Do they actually manage though? Remember Der Corbic, rural whites use a LOT of government benefits.



including the ones that are not so poor living off of the government subsidizing their crops.



Trump supporters are hurting themselves to hurt minorities & women:

Wow, didn't realize you are such a racist that you immediately assume "inner city poor and crime" = "Black Peopl" and that "Rural poor and Farmers" = "Black hating Whites on a welfare."


Good work, and excellent job of avoiding the actual topic of discussion.


As for my Rural Poor comment. Are you debating that living in Rural American nessistates owning a car more so then living in a major inner city? Are you challenging the notion that rural America has even less public transportation options then say downtown Chicago or Baltimore? What about how "butthole" Wisconsin has less crime and murder PER CAPITA then major inner cities?

You are just constantly trying to pivot away from address or discussing anything.

[gbaby2089]

nopenopenope

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by gbaby2089

Do they actually manage though? Remember Der Corbic, rural whites use a LOT of government benefits.



including the ones that are not so poor living off of the government subsidizing their crops.



Trump supporters are hurting themselves to hurt minorities & women:



https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...icle-1.3379148



https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcon...context=carsey



https://blog.ucsusa.org/sarah-reinha...merica-hardest



https://www.dailyyonder.com/geograph...8/12/31/25422/

Also, on a personnel note, as your dear friend....

Id you hate rural America so much, fucking move already. Pack your shit up and move to New York, California or wherever the fuck you think smells like roses. In everyone one of your posts you hold a strong disdain for the Midwest and anything not Metropolitan. Life's short bruh, fucking move.

[gbaby2089]

nopenopenope

[Corbic]

Originally Posted by gbaby2089

I did move. (The privilege of coming from a middle class family that gives me that flexibility to do so is a big one)

It's actually easier to uproot and move when you are poor compared to being middle class.

If you got a 7/11 job and living in a flop house in Milwaukee, what is the risk of moving to anywhere else! You've already achieved the lowest possible outcome.

Giving up a nice house in Kenosha and a decent job to hope you can make it big in Austin, that's a risk.

Originally Posted by gbaby2089

Just a heads up, Midwestern doesn't mean rural shithole full of Trumpee dumbasses. Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and other Midwestern cities are great, though not very welcoming of your backwards views.

Normally, when you make a declaration the goal is to support it, not prove it wrong. I mean, why not include Brenton Harbor, Fairfield, Akron, St Louis and Cleveland to close out that tour of shit holes?

[exitspeed]

Originally Posted by gbaby2089

I did move. (The privilege of coming from a middle class family that gives me that flexibility to do so is a big one)

I live in the densest part of a fairly large city.

Just a heads up, Midwestern doesn't mean rural shithole full of Trumpee dumbasses. Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and other Midwestern cities are great, though not very welcoming of your backwards views.

. In 2018, Baltimore was ranked 23rd in Mexico's Citizen's Council for Public Security's annual list of the 50 most dangerous cities on earth. Its homicide rate of 50.52 per 100,000 residents topped even that of San Salvador, El Salvador, which has a murder rate of 50.32 per 100,000 people. Meanwhile, the most violent city in Honduras, San Pedro Sula, has a homicide rate of 46.67 per 100,000.

This means that Baltimore is a more dangerous place to live than the two most violent cities in countries whose citizens are literally using out-of-control violence to claim asylum in the United States.

Baltimore, it should be noted, hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1967 and has been under such unanimous Democratic control that a research librarian at Baltimore's City Hall contacted by "The Dan O'Donnell Show" couldn't even find evidence of a single Republican serving on the city council in decades.

The other three American cities that made the world's 50 most dangerous list have also been under near-unanimous Democratic control for generations. St. Louis, Missouri, which ranked 16th and had America's highest murder rate at 60.59 homicides per 100,000 residents, hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1949. Detroit, which ranked 46th with a 38.78 murder rate, hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1962. New Orleans, ranked 50th with a homicide rate of 36.87, hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1872.

According to 24/7 Wall Street's analysis of violent crime rates published in USA Today earlier this year, St. Louis, Detroit, and Baltimore are also the three most dangerous cities in America with violent crime rates that each top 2,000 per 100,000 residents. By way of comparison, the national violent crime rate is 382.9 per 100,000 people.

The only other city in America to top 2,000 violent crimes per 100,000 people, Memphis, Tennessee, has never had a Republican mayor in its history.

In fact, nine of the ten most violent cities in the country have been dominated by Democrats for decades, including Kansas City, which hasn't had a Republican mayor since 1991, Cleveland, which has n't had one since 1991, and Milwaukee, which hasn't had one since 1908.

No wonder Democrats are focusing on President Trump's supposed racism: There is no question he is correct on the substance of his argument. Baltimore is a dangerous place, and so are literally dozens of other cities that Democrats have run for generations.

More wisdom from Dan O’Donnell

If liberals cared so much and Democrat poi’s lies are so effective, why aren’t these cities shining examples of HOW a city should be ran, with no poverty and no crime? Because liberals don’t give a fuck and democratic policies are shown time and time again to not work.