91 92 s13 and 93 s13 - Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

*sykikchimp* · 02-01-2002, 12:51 AM

I think the marketing guys got a little happy in 91..  How can they justify .4 seconds???  A cam should NOT give you almost half a second to sixty..  that would be like 3/4 of a second i the 1/4 mile..  which all of us know is A LOT.  If there was that much difference they shoudn't have been rated the same HP/Torque figures.  The 91 should be better?

02-01-2002, 12:51 AM	#1
sykikchimp WOW addicted Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: the moon Age: 44 Posts: 6,525 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	I think the marketing guys got a little happy in 91..  How can they justify .4 seconds???  A cam should NOT give you almost half a second to sixty..  that would be like 3/4 of a second i the 1/4 mile..  which all of us know is A LOT.  If there was that much difference they shoudn't have been rated the same HP/Torque figures.  The 91 should be better?