|
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-16-2002, 11:50 PM | #2 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: St. Louis
Age: 44
Posts: 2,263
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
no comparison. the s13 would be more fun to drive and be a show car. the z32 n/a would be another 300zx, except with a couple bolt ons and nitrous. just my opinion. <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':thumbsup:'>
__________________
02 Blazer X - 90 240SX w/SR oh noes |
08-17-2002, 12:20 AM | #3 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Age: 37
Posts: 6,296
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
S13 with SR would be better, I wouldnt bother with an NA Z, it will only be fast on the nitrous and that will run out, but the SR will only need boost fluid refills <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''> <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''>
__________________
PROCEED Grip Gambler |
08-17-2002, 09:00 AM | #4 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodbridge,VA
Age: 41
Posts: 1,028
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I would get the s13 with sr it is gong to be more fune and less weight and you dont need to refill the tank when it runs out.And if you want more power you just change the turbo and so on.Plus the z would just be a z.imo
|
08-17-2002, 09:12 AM | #5 |
Zilvia Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: DC Metro
Age: 42
Posts: 522
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
well being former z31 and z32 driver i loved both the cars..however, having been in a s13 sr b4 i would probably go for the sr s13, also depends on how the 240sx looks, some sr's are fast but the vehicle is ass'd up visually, z's are good for show and go, but then again the 240 has plenty of potential itself, thats your call, a tough desision i think
__________________
96 Kouki w/sr20det for sale http://www.zilvia.net/f/showthread.php?t=66164 |
08-17-2002, 09:18 AM | #6 |
Post Whore!
|
I've never been a fan of Z32s unless it was the TT version, so I'm sure you're not surprised that I say go SR20DET in the RPS13. Forget the strawberry face conversion and put that money into suspension.
the (RP)S13 is just so much more tossable and "fun to drive" -- especially with an SR in it. The n/a Z32 on the other hand, is big, heavy and anaemic when it comes to power when put next to an SR'd S13/14. JMHO
__________________
Instagram: @SX180HKG |
08-17-2002, 04:54 PM | #8 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Turn 8 'bout to get rolled by a SC'd ITR
Age: 45
Posts: 1,849
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Go w/ the s13 and SR you can have a look at my kill list and figure out what you want. The z32 N/A is not that fast (but still pretty damn fast) and the tuning potential is soooo much higher for the SR. Just my .02
Either car will put a smile on your face when you drive it <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''>
__________________
'91 hatch w/ SR Sold; '03 Evo Sold 401 HP; '03 MS Protege sold; '00 Evo 6.5 TME Sold 300HP |
08-17-2002, 09:36 PM | #9 |
Zilvia Junkie
|
how does the z32 compare to the rps13 in suspension wise, auto x, drift?
edit: whoops <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/crazy.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':crazy:'> |
08-18-2002, 01:42 AM | #10 |
Nissanaholic!
|
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">how does the z32 compare to the z32 in suspension wise, auto x, drift?</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
They're probably pretty similar. . .
__________________
Rowsdower saves us and saves all the world! |
08-18-2002, 03:06 AM | #11 |
Zilvia Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Jose
Age: 41
Posts: 556
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (misnomer @ Aug. 17 2002,03:42)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE"></span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">how does the z32 compare to the z32 in suspension wise, auto x, drift?</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
They're probably pretty similar. . .</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> LOL <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''> <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/hehe.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':hehe:'> <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=''> <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/lookaround.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':look:'>
__________________
|
08-18-2002, 03:16 PM | #12 |
I don't quite understand your reasoning,...why put all that money into a NA z? With the difference you could easily buy a TT. A tt stock will be faster than a modded NA anyday.
A TT will also be faster than a stock SR. Remember turbo engines have almost limitless potential, whereas NA requires alot of tuning, and the $$$ to power ratio isn't worth it. Always choose turbo. Dave |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|