![]() |
|
Motorsports and Skilled Driving Discussion for Organized Racing and motorsports and tips and techniques at becoming a better driver. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Naperville, IL
Age: 46
Posts: 2,093
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
However, I'd like to add some other things for argument's sake. The engine with the higher powerband is also going to experience MUCH higher piston speeds, therefore increasing wear on internal parts, and decreasing reliability (more friction, more heat, less time between power pulses, etc, etc.) F1 engines rev REALLY high because that's the most effective way to make NA power if restricted by displacement (simple math...more rpm = more hp). But, because of this, the engines barely make one race (however, that's not saying much, since neither do NASCAR, Indy, etc. cars). But to answer the *original* question....neither is "better." If you have the right gears, the shorter band (up high) is great...and good for controlling wheelspin and power delivery. If you have less gears, the wider, lower powerband is better. Point is, if you change the powerband, it's WISE to change the gears. Hence the reason I want a J30 3.916:1 rear end.... Eric
__________________
2002 Mazda Protege5 1989 S13 w/SR20DET (sold) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|