Is this art?

[mRclARK1]

Some of you who say art is something relative and interpertive to the viewer are right.

But remember this. So if suffering can be art? How about I come get your dog, burn him alive in the street, and take photos of my art and let everyone interpert it in their own way? Alright so sure, to someone it may be art. If we must tolerate your art, then you have to tolerate most people think it's only artwork to a sick fuck.

First a dog... maybe you next?

I'm sure the Holocaust was art to Hitler.

Relativity in morality and toleration is fine with most people in theory, it's another thing when you put it into practice when it affects their life or freedom or the same of the people or things they care about. First we accept senseless torture of an animal...

Yes, right now we're just talking about a dog, and a crucifix. It's the precedent of a line being crossed that I find disturbing. Death can be an art, in the sense of a noble or purposeful death... I see no art in suffering inflicted on something for no reason. I'll never see art in disrespecting someone's religion. No matter which it may be.

Finally... I'm just a big dog lover. I'd fuck nearly anyone up for hurting my dog without cause.