![]() |
|
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Walnut Crizzle, Crackifornia
Age: 46
Posts: 1,266
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
What makes this any different from tuning with an AEM ems? The key factor here is resolution. Uprev is cheap no doubt, but AEM is much more superior as far as resolution is concerned.
UPREV also has its limitations with dyno jet tuners that aren't familiar with osiris/uprev. There is a local shop here in concord that uses the dyno jet and they have no clue how to use osiris. Some options on the uprev I also don't think are needed such as 5 MAPS per cruise control system. This is more of a preference I would think. Both have good qualities, but in any instance although the AEM cost more I would prefer it over the uprev/osiris.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Post Whore!
![]() |
What's the difference?
I always get this as well from people. A standalone is a standalone is a standalone. Now mind you some are far superior than others for the money, like Haltech is great, AEM is pretty good (although they basically completely copied the Haltech on their new release), the Power FC is an easy to learn first option...but any other unit is basically the same. If you can tell me the resolution of the tables and the units on the axis I can write a map for it, end of story.
__________________
Like Me on FaceBook ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|