![]() |
|
Off Topic Chat All non related chat goes here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Post Whore!
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
-two gangbangers succumb to gang violence and get shot -two sikhs get shot in sacramento for absolutely no reason (recent true story) -an arson attacks a high school -multiple attacks of arson happen in the castro district all within days of each other (recent true story) how you cannot extrapolate the differences between a crime and a "hate" crime is beyond me...dont be stupid...hate crimes exist and they ARE not "stupid"...
__________________
s14| y34| 911 gts| exige s| 600rr| r3| 250r| 85 girlfriend ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
![]() |
#2 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
![]() |
Quote:
-two gangbangers get shot because they were involved in violent activity and willing put themselves into situations in which they might get shot -two innocent people were gunned down for no other reason than they're religious affiliation. Each crime should be judged on an individual basis and the second should receive a much harsher sentence than the first, but having pre-existing laws in place that make distinctions between racial/religious/sexual preference groups doesn't make sense. If a crime is especially disgusting and unjust it should be punished as such. Sentencing is variable for exactly this reason. Having extra laws is unnecessary and simply further entrenches the differences that created the 'hate crime' in the first place. Do you see my perspective? edit: to clarify my position, i of course believe that hate crimes exist, but that does not mean that there should be extra legislation based on ethnic/religious/sexual preference condtions. In your examples the two crimes are not equivalent, but say for example you are comparing the murder of the two sikhs to, say, a white male killing two other white males because they are wearing Obama t-shirts. Is that crime any less despicable because the victims are of the same race? In both cases a man is killing two innocent people simply because he has differing beliefs than them, but with hate crime legislation in place, the first scenario would warrant a harsher sentence simply because the religious affiliation of the attacker and victim is different. That doesnt make sense. Each case should be looked at individually and be sentenced without bias due to ethnicity etc... Last edited by gearhead55; 04-28-2011 at 11:42 AM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|