The 2020 Presidential Race - Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

RalliartRsX · 09-10-2020, 10:39 AM

And tell me what you define by contribute and have their best interest? Because as far as I am concerned, people in the US have a very self centered interest. So what makes the rich white guys motivation to vote to consolidate his wealth MORE important than the black mom who is voting for someone to push to strike down red lining? Which one a "better" contributor to society as a whole?

The entire notion of landowner is seeded in racism, simple. And if your rhetoric is, people who own land as opposed to...citizens, that's essentially a racist rhetoric....which you stand by although it has been proven it is racist in essence.

It would be one thing to state as such as everyone has a view point. Its another to state your opinion, being told (with actual proof) it's rooted in racism and then move to double down. That's racist as its a conscious decision to accept a false narrative seeded in racism as your stance.

Ps the screaming blue haired barista has every right to voice his or her opinion and voting choice as the rich white couple from St Louis with shitty gun control hiding behind some inane idea of protecting property

Its called democracy.

dbeiler · 09-10-2020, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RalliartRsX

REEEE, REEEEE, REEEEEE, you're racist, it's racist, that's racist

This is literally how you reply to anybody you disagree with. Give it a rest already.

09-10-2020, 10:39 AM	#1
RalliartRsX Post Whore! Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Maryland Posts: 4,793 Trader Rating: (32) Feedback Score: 32 reviews	And tell me what you define by contribute and have their best interest? Because as far as I am concerned, people in the US have a very self centered interest. So what makes the rich white guys motivation to vote to consolidate his wealth MORE important than the black mom who is voting for someone to push to strike down red lining? Which one a "better" contributor to society as a whole? The entire notion of landowner is seeded in racism, simple. And if your rhetoric is, people who own land as opposed to...citizens, that's essentially a racist rhetoric....which you stand by although it has been proven it is racist in essence. It would be one thing to state as such as everyone has a view point. Its another to state your opinion, being told (with actual proof) it's rooted in racism and then move to double down. That's racist as its a conscious decision to accept a false narrative seeded in racism as your stance. Ps the screaming blue haired barista has every right to voice his or her opinion and voting choice as the rich white couple from St Louis with shitty gun control hiding behind some inane idea of protecting property Its called democracy.